1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News AMD R7 265 is new $149 champion

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Meanmotion, 13 Feb 2014.

  1. Meanmotion

    Meanmotion bleh Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    12
  2. bawjaws

    bawjaws Multimodder

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    4,154
    Likes Received:
    751
    "AMD R7 is new $149 champion"

    Isn't the headline here somewhat... presumptious? You've not even tested the card yet, but the headline reads (to me at least) as if you're proclaiming it to be the best $149 card out there. Just think it's a bit of a misleading title - "AMD proclaims R7 as new $149 champion" would be more accurate, imo.

    I assume you will be reviewing it shortly?
     
  3. rollo

    rollo Modder

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,872
    Likes Received:
    127
    Anandtech has review for both.

    It's about 10% slower than the 270 in metro last light.

    Depending on pricing it could be good. Problem is AMD cards are been priced $20-$30 above rrp so they are overpriced. As other sites have said if it comes in at that price then the 270 looks overpriced for the 10% it gives
    Extra performance.
     
  4. Hustler

    Hustler Minimodder

    Joined:
    8 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    1,034
    Likes Received:
    34
    Not worth a penny over £99.99
     
  5. Harlequin

    Harlequin Modder

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2004
    Posts:
    7,078
    Likes Received:
    179
    its not AMD - its etailers that are price gouging
     
  6. xaser04

    xaser04 Ba Ba Ba BANANA!

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    2,309
    Likes Received:
    256
    Don't you mean 16 compute units? 1024/64 = 16

    I am going to change my sig now to highlight the fact that my wife's PC now has a "R7 265" inside..... *Yawn*
     
  7. SchizoFrog

    SchizoFrog What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    5 May 2009
    Posts:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    8
    Not really, 'champion' doesn't always mean 'winner'. For example in past times when a duel was to be fought, the actual parties would not fight themselves but would rather send in their 'champion', someone to fight for them in their stead. I would imagine that usually that individual would have been the best warrior but that was not always the case... So in this case it could be taken to mean that this is the card the AMD are sending in to do battle at the $149 price point... So it is AMD's champion and not necessarily the GPU champion.
     
  8. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    102
    Seems like this should be in the "Industry news" section :(

    It's disappointing because I'm thinking about getting a new GPU and making the switch from nVidia to AMD because I've heard AMD cards are better for WoT. Then I find out that this isn't a review, but rather a rehash of someone's press release.

    I expect better from bit.
     
  9. Star*Dagger

    Star*Dagger What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    30 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    882
    Likes Received:
    11
    Never understand these, why not spend 300$ and get a halfway decent card, or $600 and get an elite one, false economy.
     
  10. rollo

    rollo Modder

    Joined:
    16 May 2008
    Posts:
    7,872
    Likes Received:
    127
    Did not say it was AMD, does not dispute the fact that its happening.

    Check out eBay some 7970s marked bitcoin have sold for crazy money.
     
  11. bawjaws

    bawjaws Multimodder

    Joined:
    5 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    4,154
    Likes Received:
    751
    OK, I see where you're coming from here, but I respectfully disagree :). If we're assuming that the R7 265 is AMD's "representative" at $149, shouldn't the headline refer to "R7 265 is AMD's new $149 champion"? Otherwise, it does read as if it's the best card at $149 rather than AMD's best card at that price...

    That aside, to be honest it's quite disappointing that this is basically a rehash of a press release with added references to someone else's reviews. There was a time where Bit would have been publishing their own review first instead rather than relying on what others were saying. Hopefully they'll be giving us their own verdict soon, and keeping this sort of article in the Industy News section where it belongs.
     
  12. Harlequin

    Harlequin Modder

    Joined:
    4 Jun 2004
    Posts:
    7,078
    Likes Received:
    179
    rather buy a £40 antminer - usb powered and 1.6gh/s than a gpu for mining noiw tbh
     
  13. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    102
    I can't justify spending that much on a video card to play a free game. Honestly, I'm not sure I can justify $150, but that is at least in the realm of the possible. Sure I would get more bang for the buck (rubble for the Rouble?) with a $300 card, but that would be over a full week's wages just to buy a video card for a game a I play a few hours a week when I'm not working.

    I've currently got a GT320 and a 7800GT installed which together give me about 16 fps on most battles. Not great, but playable. Barely. I've heard that AMD is better supported by WoT, which is why I'm looking at their offerings when before I've pretty much always ran nVidia cards.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page