Reviews AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Review

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 7 Jul 2019.

  1. bit-tech

    bit-tech Supreme Overlord Lover of bit-tech Administrator

    Joined:
    12 Mar 2001
    Posts:
    3,676
    Likes Received:
    138
    Read more
     
  2. Vault-Tec

    Vault-Tec Green Plastic Watering Can

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2015
    Posts:
    15,298
    Likes Received:
    3,939
    CB score is insane :O
     
  3. Anfield

    Anfield Multimodder

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    7,077
    Likes Received:
    980
    Don't worry, I'll get my revenge when Zen 2 Ripper drops:grin:
     
  4. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,989
    Likes Received:
    750
    Still can't run many NVMe drives like my lowly 8 core ripper, so i am happy enough :p

    Nice little bump though, with added benefit it's brought the price down on the 12 core TR 2xxx to a level that I am almost tempted to move on my 1900x, but i'd be a fool not to wait a few months to see the lay of the land when TR3 drops, as it would be nice to use my DDR4 at its rated speed.

    I was expecting Zen2 to be a bit stronger in single core stuff but it is still early days, doubt anyone has had time to have a deep play, each prior gen has got better with tweaks to BIOS etc, my TR1900x does the same single core as the tr2920x reviewed here in CBR20 for example just through tweaking.
     
    Last edited: 7 Jul 2019
  5. Wakka

    Wakka Yo, eat this, ya?

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2017
    Posts:
    2,117
    Likes Received:
    673
    On the other end of the scale, where are the 3400G reviews? It's literally available to buy now, but I can't find any reviews. Yeah, I know it's only Zen+, but i'm interested to see if the increased cache, faster memory support and considerably higher IGP and core clcokspeeds make it a proper jump over the 2400G.
     
  6. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,989
    Likes Received:
    750
    3400G doesn't have faster memory support, 2933 is your lot, it just has clockspeed bump.
    .
     
  7. Wakka

    Wakka Yo, eat this, ya?

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2017
    Posts:
    2,117
    Likes Received:
    673
    I meant the general memory compatibility improvements that came with Zen+.

    Though I suspect the next gen of APU's to be really tasty - Proper Zen 2 chiplet with Navi IGP? Ohhh yeaaaaah.
     
  8. Skiddywinks

    Skiddywinks Minimodder

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    932
    Likes Received:
    8
    What's interesting is that Zen 2 actually has better IPC than Intel's best (I think it was in an LTT video). The thing really holding back AMD at the moment is the clock speed ceiling they have hit. If it wasn't for that, the 3000 series would be knocking everything out of the park, and would be winning every benchmark. Shame that overclocking them seems so pointless when you lose the higher single core boost.
     
  9. sandys

    sandys Multimodder

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2006
    Posts:
    4,989
    Likes Received:
    750
    I don't really overclock anymore, not much to be gained for the extra voltage and temps that require handling, so just leave the chip to its thing, Gen1 Ryzen boost is a bit harsh though but I have the 8 core TR which has highest base clocks of all gen1 chips and would buy the same when I upgrade, the chip with highest base when I next upgrade and just let boost do its thing as an when.
     
  10. Wakka

    Wakka Yo, eat this, ya?

    Joined:
    23 Feb 2017
    Posts:
    2,117
    Likes Received:
    673
    Be interesting to see a test of a 9900K vs a 3700X, both set at 4Ghz all-core, and see where the IPC crown really is now.
     
  11. Anfield

    Anfield Multimodder

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    7,077
    Likes Received:
    980
  12. yuusou

    yuusou Multimodder

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    2,914
    Likes Received:
    992
    Hardware Unboxed did this. AMD is ahead.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page