News ARM details Cortex A15 chip

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by julieb, 9 Sep 2010.

  1. julieb

    julieb What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    12 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. TomH

    TomH BELTALOWDA!

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2002
    Posts:
    837
    Likes Received:
    45
    I'm glad to see ARM taking this step forward. This can only lead to good things - namely, more competition and more processing cores per rack (important, when you're Facebook et al).

    64-bit will come in time. This sounds like it'll be a great first-generation product.
     
  3. Phalanx

    Phalanx Needs more dragons and stuff.

    Joined:
    28 Apr 2010
    Posts:
    3,712
    Likes Received:
    156
    I think they'll fail simply because it's not 64-bit. If they're aiming for the big guns, then 64-bit is a must. Larger companies will see this and not buy it because of it (I know our company won't recommend it to people we consult for), and then ARM will not make a 64-bit because their first didn't sell well.

    I hope I'm wrong, I truly do, but I feel I might be on the right track.
     
  4. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Lover of bit-tech Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    18,048
    Likes Received:
    8,109
    I dunno - I mean, I can see the argument, but the people buying an ARM-based server have already made a concious effort to move away from x86. A move from 64-bit x86 to 32-bit ARM with LPAE is not likely to be much more complicated than a move from 64-bit x86 to 64-bit ARM (if such a thing existed.)
     
  5. iwod

    iwod What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dont see why you would need 64bit on servers apart from Memory requirement. In terms of TCO, i actually think ARM is well fitted for Server Operation.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page