1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware Dynamode HD Media Player Review

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by arcticstoat, 2 Jul 2011.

  1. arcticstoat

    arcticstoat New Member

    Joined:
    19 May 2004
    Posts:
    916
    Likes Received:
    13
  2. mkb

    mkb Member

    Joined:
    2 May 2010
    Posts:
    406
    Likes Received:
    5
    What a complete dross product.
     
  3. Toploaded

    Toploaded New Member

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    6
    Having HD in the title for something that's unable to really play 1080P is borderline false advertising surely (at least, for a product released in 2011, maybe in 2006 I'd have forgiven it).
     
  4. Paradigm Shifter

    Paradigm Shifter de nihilo nihil fit

    Joined:
    10 May 2006
    Posts:
    2,096
    Likes Received:
    38
    So you've given a product which basically doesn't work as advertised, 42%? That seems high, given that much of the review focused on what it a) doesn't have and b) can't do.

    You get what you pay for, though. I wouldn't expect an HD Media Player for <£35 and Dynamode proved me right.
     
  5. SexyHyde

    SexyHyde Member

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    609
    Likes Received:
    11
    Can it play 720 fine. As that is also a hd resolution.
     
  6. Toploaded

    Toploaded New Member

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    6
    Yeah I guess, I'm just being a PC elitist I suppose. After all PS3 and 360 are regarded as HD consoles and a good chuck of games for them are only 720P (or even lower and up scaled). I suppose if it was 1080p it would say 'Full HD'.
     
  7. SexyHyde

    SexyHyde Member

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2009
    Posts:
    609
    Likes Received:
    11
    It may not be able to play 720. But I don't like the fact it has obviously lost loads of points for not doing 1080, so someone with a 720 tv might see the review and dismiss it, when it might actually be fine for them. Especially when most of my friends say they prefer 720 on a good 720 screen to 1080 on a poor 1080 one.
     
  8. GregTheRotter

    GregTheRotter New Member

    Joined:
    9 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,263
    Likes Received:
    88
    lol, I paid around £80 for my WDTV when it first came out. No lan connection, but plays mkv's just fine. 1080p too. You get what you pay for.
     
  9. macroman

    macroman The One

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2001
    Posts:
    1,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    It has no network connection? Why does it score any points? Network connectivity is a must these days
     
  10. fluxtatic

    fluxtatic New Member

    Joined:
    25 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    507
    Likes Received:
    5
    I think I'd rather drop a bit more on one that can actually handle 1080p, even if I had a 720p television (I don't watch tv anymore, tbh) That way I wouldn't need to replace it if I upgraded the tv later...and no network port? WTF is the point of this device at all?
     
  11. Almightyrastus

    Almightyrastus Rule #9

    Joined:
    21 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    347
    We just splashed out on a WD TV live to replace our ageing KISS player and it has been an absolute joy to use and setup. As the review says, it costs twice as much as this one but I wouldn't hesitate to spend that.
     
  12. GregTheRotter

    GregTheRotter New Member

    Joined:
    9 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,263
    Likes Received:
    88
    LOL, I must be the only one who isn't crying about not having a network port. xD
     
  13. xela333

    xela333 New Member

    Joined:
    19 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
  14. dudwasup

    dudwasup New Member

    Joined:
    16 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's why you just by an apple tv. May be a little more limited to streaming but then you jailbreak it and it's great
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page