1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Intel Configures Antennas for a Multi-Radio Future

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 16 Apr 2007.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. DarkLord7854

    DarkLord7854 New Member

    Joined:
    22 Jun 2005
    Posts:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    121
    So wait.. is it a good thing or a bad thing? o_O
     
  3. DougEdey

    DougEdey I pwn all your storage

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    13,933
    Likes Received:
    33
    IMO it's a good thing, the 2.4GHz band is currently flooded with everything, it has 2.4GHz wireless, 2.4GHz AV signals and a lot more. And the Wireless band only has 5MHz increments between channels

    2.6GHz is a relatively "clean" spectrum so you'll get less interference meaning less parity errors and a stronger signal strength.
     
  4. sinizterguy

    sinizterguy Dark & Sinizter

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    5,461
    Likes Received:
    0
    They need more antennas just to handle all the current stuff - leave alone this 60 GHz stuff.
     
  5. Miser

    Miser New Member

    Joined:
    1 Oct 2005
    Posts:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's a little rough reading. :thumb:
    Otherwise, great article!
     
  6. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    It was rushed between keynotes tbh. Ive a LOT more detailed information on it but I'm seeing the wireless people later in the week so, given time, will put it all into a round up article when I get back (or on the plane, YAY for 10.5 hr flight but only a 3 hour battery).
     
  7. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    you need a ThinkPad X60s -- 10 hours baby!! :D
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page