1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Blogs Intel should simplify its CPU naming policy

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by brumgrunt, 29 Nov 2012.

  1. brumgrunt

    brumgrunt New Member

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2011
    Posts:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    27
  2. iwod

    iwod New Member

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    And it is not even about naming either, they should simply shrink their product line. Not having the same core CPU but one with VT-D and one without.
     
  3. ch424

    ch424 Design Warrior

    Joined:
    26 May 2004
    Posts:
    3,112
    Likes Received:
    41
    Surely if a non-gamer friend wants a laptop, you tell them to buy the one with the nicest display, keyboard and battery life? CPU performance is moot as soon as you put an SSD in it!
     
  4. blacko

    blacko New Member

    Joined:
    30 Jul 2012
    Posts:
    138
    Likes Received:
    2
    i've always been fond of the Pentium name. It reminds of the P3 and P4 days and the speed war going on between AMD and Intel.

    This speed war was picked up by mainstream media and the Pentium name was thrusted into average joes pc vocabulary and resulting in todays PC world mess. Intel should have binned Celeron and Pentium when they switched to the core i series. An i1 and i2 would have done the job and average joe responds well to numbers.....
     
  5. Dave Lister

    Dave Lister Member

    Joined:
    1 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    871
    Likes Received:
    10
    I can honestly say that Intel have me completely lost with there CPU's, my last intel chip was a q6600 and back then I could follow what was going on pretty easily. Now there are 3 different sockets (I think) and then you have core i3, i5 and i7 which from what i've seen all have similar performance depending on model numbers.

    I may sound like I don't know what i'm talking about here - which is because I don't !
     
  6. r3loaded

    r3loaded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    31
    Forget ordinary consumers, it's a confusing scheme for CS students too! Obviously, being a bit-techer I know the ins and outs of each architecture, but even otherwise knowledgeable people are stumped by the naming scheme. Here's an example of a conversation I had with a friend:

     
  7. Griffter

    Griffter New Member

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2012
    Posts:
    414
    Likes Received:
    1
    i think change naming convention to 1234etc... and if they cant... just add the date to whatever name they have... 2011 edition and 2012 edition... maybe add month if there is more than one a year.. ppl can then just by that, the latest to older and see price difference.
     
  8. Nexxo

    Nexxo Queue Jumper

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    33,626
    Likes Received:
    1,275
    "Fast Chip", "Faster Chip" and "Even Faster Chip" (or F, F+ and F++)?
     
  9. steveo_mcg

    steveo_mcg New Member

    Joined:
    26 May 2005
    Posts:
    5,841
    Likes Received:
    80
    You can imagine the hyperbole after a few years of that naming convention, especially if AMD got in on it...
     
  10. Fingers66

    Fingers66 Kiwi in London

    Joined:
    30 Apr 2010
    Posts:
    8,145
    Likes Received:
    623
    Maybe I am a cynic but what motivation would Intel have for changing the naming convention if the confusion is causing joe public to buy all the old stock of crappy Pentium chips in desktops/laptops?
     
  11. xaser04

    xaser04 Ba Ba Ba BANANA!

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    2,076
    Likes Received:
    127
    TBH compared to Nvidia's mobile GPU line up, Intels CPU naming scheme is child's play.
     
  12. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    The naming conventions clearly help them to shift old stock from the shelves. Its probably doing exactly what it was designed to do - confuse.
     
  13. Griffter

    Griffter New Member

    Joined:
    1 Jun 2012
    Posts:
    414
    Likes Received:
    1
    intel buster, intel buster-buster, intel buster-buster-buster-2000 baby!
     
  14. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    and we are not even talking about the chipsets. Right now Intel offers, for LGA1155 only :

    - B75
    - P67, P75
    - H61, H67, H77
    - Q77
    - Z68, Z75, Z77, Z78

    it's far too many chipsets ... how many, even among us, know the exact differences between all those ?
     
  15. Gareth Halfacree

    Gareth Halfacree WIIGII! Staff Administrator Super Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    12,707
    Likes Received:
    1,977
    Wasn't that the idea behind the star rating system launched alongside the new logos back in 2009?
     
  16. blacko

    blacko New Member

    Joined:
    30 Jul 2012
    Posts:
    138
    Likes Received:
    2
    you evil man bringing this up....
     
  17. r3loaded

    r3loaded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    1,095
    Likes Received:
    31
    Easy, first of all Z78 doesn't exist (at least, not yet). Ignore the others and go for Z77 :p
     
  18. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    Oh yeaaaaaaah xD .... just (re)mentioned it because I'm asked twice a day by friends who are lost with Intel chipsets. They are aware of celeron < pentium < i3 < i5 < i7 .... but when it comes to chipsets ....

    Oops, my bad .... missed copy / paste :D
     
  19. dogknees

    dogknees New Member

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Is it more complex than understanding all the options of engines in a car? We have displacement, cylinder count and layout, turbo/supercharging, petrol/diesel/gas/hybrid/electric/..., number of gear ratios and their spread, manual/automatic,....

    Seems just as complex to me and people seem to be able to make choices that suit them when buying a car. Why is this (cpu lines and models) any harder?

    Or is it that we still seem to be treating PCs as somehow different, as something people shouldn't have to expend effort learning about? Maybe it's about time people invested some time and effort to understand something that's as big a part of their lives as their cars.
     
  20. GuilleAcoustic

    GuilleAcoustic Ook ? Ook !

    Joined:
    26 Nov 2010
    Posts:
    3,277
    Likes Received:
    71
    I think that most people only looks at this when bying a car :

    - overall look
    - Price
    - horse power
    - consumption
    - luggage compartment size

    eventually the amount of seats when more than 2 childrens.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page