1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Motorola ditching Windows Mobile?

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 28 Jan 2009.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. yuusou

    yuusou Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    2,043
    Likes Received:
    305
    Now thats a kick in the nuts for proprietary mobile software, even tho Symbian is going Open-Source. Curious to see how this move goes.
     
  3. thefriscokid

    thefriscokid why s**t so crazy?

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    909
    Likes Received:
    13
    Does anybody even buy Motorola mobiles anymore?
     
  4. Zut

    Zut New Member

    Joined:
    5 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Meh, I'm too jaded to get excited about mobile operating systems anymore. For the 2% of the time I use my phone for something other than making calls it just isn't worth all this fuss.
     
  5. perplekks45

    perplekks45 LIKE AN ANIMAL!

    Joined:
    9 May 2004
    Posts:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    409
    I am not a fan of the one-does-it-all machines phones are nowerdays. I use my phone to call/text people, that's it. For music I have an iPod Touch [I know, it's more than just a MP3 player... :p], for pictures I grab my girlfriend's camera because mine's still in Germany. So basically I am just not part of the target market. Still I think there should be competition in the market and at the moment everybody seems to go Android, just like [almost] everyone went MS before. Let's see what happens.
     
  6. n3mo

    n3mo New Member

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    184
    Likes Received:
    1
    Windows Mobile is still lightyears behind Symbian. I used several HTC smartphones (Vox is my all-time favourite), but every time WM fails (again) my trustworthy E61i is there to save me. WM is just like any other Windows - looks and feels nice and easy, but when it comes to serious business it simply doesn't work good enough. Symbian is way better. I haven't used Android too much (still waiting for my dev pack to arrive) but it seems more like a multimedia oriented platform (although, being open-source it is very flexible)

    And remember, Motorola started making Linux based phones in 2003, and most of their current high models are based on a Linux/Java platform so moving to Android seems like a natural step.
     
  7. cpu121

    cpu121 New Member

    Joined:
    25 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    327
    Likes Received:
    0
    Weren't Microsoft hinting that they wanted to reduce the range of WM models anyway so they could focus on models that could compete with the iPhone etc?
     
  8. perplekks45

    perplekks45 LIKE AN ANIMAL!

    Joined:
    9 May 2004
    Posts:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    409
    What exactly is Windows, the normal one not Mobile, not good enough for? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Windows is flawless or perfect, actually far from it, but I don't see it fall short in day-to-day use in comparison to Linux. At least not for the vast majority.
     
  9. Horizon

    Horizon Dremel Worthy

    Joined:
    30 May 2008
    Posts:
    765
    Likes Received:
    10
    Dear Motorola,

    Please die, you been milking the razer for what seems almost a decade now, every year your phones have been getting cheaper and less intuitive and from the looks it this is just clearly a cost-cutting measure. Usually i wouldn't mind but i can't imagine what piece of crap phone you are going to put android on. Switching to android isn't going to save you.
     
  10. n3mo

    n3mo New Member

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    184
    Likes Received:
    1
    You kidding me? Try running Vista in a multilayer network with more than one domain controller. Or try to control the usage of multiple network connections. Oh, wait, Windows can't do that. Link aggregation? No. QoS? No. Safety? Oh no. Parallel computing? No. load balancing? No. The list goes on and on.

    Windows was made for casual, day to day usage and in that it beats any other OS (maybe not for long). Serious stuff? No Win please. Even Windows Update servers run on BSD.

    Win Mobile is just like that - good for casual use, but try having a few hundred contacts and you'll see what I'm talking about. (I'm talking about business usage, that's what interests me. Symbian handles everything well, not to mention Blackberry)
     
  11. Saivert

    Saivert New Member

    Joined:
    26 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    390
    Likes Received:
    1
    Oh and we all know internet is serious business.


    (haha couldn't resist!)
     
  12. perplekks45

    perplekks45 LIKE AN ANIMAL!

    Joined:
    9 May 2004
    Posts:
    5,865
    Likes Received:
    409
    That's what I said, isn't it? It's not falling short on a day-to-day usage comparison with any other OS. I do however agree for servers there might be better options in certain/most scenarios. I worked for a company with a network for 2000 employees 100% Windows based. It worked. Maybe not perfect but everything worked exactly as it should.
     
  13. n3mo

    n3mo New Member

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    184
    Likes Received:
    1
    @perplekks45

    I make a living from designing and building corporate networks, and believe me - windows always gives problems. Not a day goes by without some windows-related emergencies. Windows is good for ignorants/people that don't care how everything works and just want to browse their facebook. Windows + business = epic fail.

    And yes, the "vast majority" of users fall under the "ignorants" name so windows is perfect for them, I have to agree with that, so for day-to-day usage it's ok.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page