Discussion in 'General' started by RTT, 9 Sep 2001.
What is the better card for performance and quality?
Kyro 2 without a doubt mate
Kyro 2 has got better picture quality too
HE MEANS PCI
In that case get a Mac PCI Voodoo 5 then flash it with the PC bios.
Why Mac?!?!?! There still easy to get and cheap...
ive seen those V5 5500 for sale for about 50 quids 250 when they first came out - LOL
Its a top card for its new low price
edit the poll - have a neither option ! I vote neither !
I just upgraded my Voodoo 3 card to a Gainward GF2 MX400 (Twinview & VIVO) and the performance isn't much different, slightly higher FPS in CS - 60fps@1024x768x16bpp as opposed to 40 fps with the voodoo.
And Unreal Tournament sucks ass with the GF2
perfectly playable for me with a gf2 mx....time to patch UT and/or your video drivers perhaps?
kyro 2 spits all over the MX btw
Aye fraid I disagree too, I have a GF2 GTS and it's fine
not if its in a low powered system
then the mx spits all over the kyro
I've been told by many people that the reason UT isn't so great with my MX is because i need to patch it....but I don't know how / can't be bothered to do that cause I mostly play CS these days anyway...
true, in a low powered system the MX would probably beat it for fps, but for visual quality it would still have the edge rich
anything over 650Mhz from what i've read and the Kyro starts pulling away
I have a:
128 MB RAM (probably gonna update to a 256, if i can be arsed)
Intel 810e chipset
I think thats all the information you need.
So, now whats the better card??
Separate names with a comma.