1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

SATA Raptor vs. IDE

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by kjkurtz20, 3 Mar 2006.

  1. kjkurtz20

    kjkurtz20 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Right now I'm running 2 ide hard drives. One seagate and one western digital caviar. I was thinking of upgrading to a Raptor with SATA I. Is this a worthwhile upgrade? How much difference would it make?
     
  2. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    36GB raptor - next to no difference
    74GB - If you keep your disks fairly well defragged, you probably won't notice a difference
    150GB - should be notably faster, but I'm just guessing based off of reviews. It also depends what you're looking to speed up - it may "feel" a bit faster, but it probably won't have a big influence on loading times.

    Honestly, I wouldn't bother... they're way too expensive for the size, and most home users (gamers included) aren't going to notice a huge difference. My defragged 36GB Raptor feels no snappier than my defragged 300GB Maxtor, and considering they're not too different in price...
     
  3. Boswell

    Boswell Minimodder

    Joined:
    23 May 2005
    Posts:
    1,050
    Likes Received:
    5
    i think you will notice the difference... dont get the 36 gig, get the 74 or 150. Even if it does apparently "feel" faster... thats what we want - as long as we think its faster.. then it is faster :) ... but i generally do think that the raptor is faster and you will be able to see load times change (especially loading windows...)
    thats my opinion anyway.
     
  4. atanum141

    atanum141 I fapped to your post!

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    7,986
    Likes Received:
    19
    with older IDE drives the would be a small difference between them and the raptor but as with newer 300+gig drives with 16meg cashe there will be little increase. personally i'd rather go with a uber fast SATA drive like the hitachi's with huge space compared to a very expensive small capasity raptor.
     
  5. Krikkit

    Krikkit All glory to the hypnotoad! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    23,929
    Likes Received:
    657
    Dude, no. Raptors make a BIG difference for burst-read operation. I certainly notice the difference.
     
  6. BlitzenWagon

    BlitzenWagon What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    2 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    dont bother getting a 36gb raptor... i notice a bit of difference but not enough to justify $130+ for it... if you want a quick one get the 150gb one.
     
  7. kjkurtz20

    kjkurtz20 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well right now it just takes awhile to load windows and such so i was just thinking this might help. I've decided to hold off on buying it for now, but might consider it in the future. it doesnt seem THAT outragously expensive and i dont need anything big as all my files are stored on my server on the other end of my gigabit network...the only thing i need on my hard drive is windows and the files to run programs. My server is only a p3 though with no sata or anything so that probably isnt the fastest for file access anyway even though with gigabit its basically just like a local ide. Any other thoughts are appretiated.
     
  8. Sgoaty

    Sgoaty Minimodder

    Joined:
    4 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    928
    Likes Received:
    203
    I noticed a huge difference with a raptor especially in BF2 load times
     
  9. phuzz

    phuzz This is a title

    Joined:
    28 May 2004
    Posts:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    27
    Moved my windows install from an 80Gb hitachi (8Mb cache) to a 74Gb raptor (WD740GD), boot time (from power button pressed to fully into windows) dropped from ~60s to 45s.
    YMMV
    Oh, and it seems to run cooler than my 250Gb maxtors as well, but then it is just above them...
     
  10. Cookie Monster

    Cookie Monster Multimodder

    Joined:
    27 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    4,522
    Likes Received:
    667
    Ive just built a system this morning and installed a 36gb raptor and the load time for windows is good (having only had 30gb drives in the past its a vast improvement) May help ive just jumped from 256mb of ram to 1gb too like;)
     
  11. grungedead

    grungedead Minimodder

    Joined:
    8 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    apparently sataII drives are pretty comparable in terms of sustained transfer rates to the raptors, it put me off buying a set of two 74gb raptors and buying one big ass 200gb sataII drie
     

Share This Page