1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Blogs Thoughts on King Arthur II

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by brumgrunt, 12 Jun 2012.

  1. brumgrunt

    brumgrunt New Member

    Joined:
    16 Dec 2011
    Posts:
    1,009
    Likes Received:
    27
  2. CowBlazed

    CowBlazed New Member

    Joined:
    9 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    254
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's too bad, there is so much to love about the first game and any issues were mostly overlooked just to be able to guide those heroes and armies to victory while choosing their roles and compositions. It was challenging while rarely feeling impossible, something which the majority of games don't get right.

    Strange how sequels can get it so wrong sometimes.
     
  3. [-Stash-]

    [-Stash-] New Member

    Joined:
    23 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    "…as I wad by Kind Arthur I"

    iWad, is that like an emergency device for when you run out of iPads?

    Spell checking aside, it's disappointing to hear they seem to have missed the mark so badly with the sequel.
     
  4. alpaca

    alpaca llama eats dremel

    Joined:
    27 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    1,132
    Likes Received:
    45
    "It was a nice nod to games"
    I guess you means 'gamers"? sloppy sloppy :)

    On the other hand. I was going to buy this thing. But now I know I did good to forget about it until it was too late...
     
  5. silky

    silky New Member

    Joined:
    25 May 2012
    Posts:
    105
    Likes Received:
    2
    I thought the first one was a bit of a mess, but showed promise and I hoped the sequel would get to where the game needs to be. But once I saw the reviews I decided to just skip it.

    :(
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page