Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by bit-tech, 4 Oct 2019.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I miss the days when we pilloried the Soviet Union for eavesdropping on its citizens, and shouted loudly about how the right to privacy was sacred and violating it was a sure sign of corruption and villainy.
A 'to' too many?
To me, that plan to implement end-to-end encryption by Facebook is just an attempt to curb the hate against them. They will never give up the ability to spy on their users. It's their raison d'être.
If they introduced end-to-end encryption they wouldn't be able to spy on their users though, would they?
Two to? "To" too many.
I think one of the points I saw against this implementation was legal systems not being able to monitor abhorrent/deviant activity that has criminal repercussions, where FB would be facilitating them by allowing these levels of encryption.
Of course they would, they own the route between the users so can sniff away to their hearts content. You didn't think it would be TRUE end to end encryption did you? Despite all the marketing BS about it being end user to end user encryption, I think we can almost guarantee that Farcebook will be sniffing the messages because, well... they can.
As said above, snooping on their users is the reason for their existence in the first place, they are in the ad & data hoovering business like Google.
I can absolutely assure you that WhatsApp uses true end-to-end encryption. The Signal protocol, in fact.
'course, Facebook can still spy on your messages 'cos it also controls both endpoints... and, last I checked, the default setting on WhatsApp was to upload plaintext versions of your entire message and media history to Google for "backup" purposes. But still, it's definitely end-to-end encrypted.
The point is that Farcebook control both endpoints so yes, they will snoop on users. It also means that US authorities have a means to request, with a court order, the messages. All this crying wolf by governments is pointless posturing.
Makes you wonder if those complaining about encryption are the ones that are likely to be getting locked out of stuff that the encryption would otherwise prohibit them from... enjoying.
You mean like checking my bank balance online, buying stuff online, paying bills without using snail mail, and generally using the internet.
Exactly, they'd need a court order. That's not always easy to get and might take longer than they want. It's getting more and more expensive to spy on us.
Not... quite the kind of activities I alluded to; IYKWIM.
Separate names with a comma.