1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News WHS refresh ditches auto-backup

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 19 May 2008.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. neonplanet40

    neonplanet40 New Member

    Joined:
    3 Mar 2003
    Posts:
    479
    Likes Received:
    1
    Im not amused to be honest. I wish i hadnt of bought the OS now. I now have 3TB of backups and storage which can be lost at any minute. Add this to the slow transfer speeds, corruption possibilities and everything else and you have a typical half assed microsoft product where we are all the testing mice.

    Not amused. Any wonder ppl pirate software tbh. I wont buy a microsoft product again.
     
  3. leexgx

    leexgx CPC hang out zone (i Fix pcs i do )

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2006
    Posts:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    8
    the way M$ not fixing the problem in WHS is poor, id recommend that you stop useing it and get windows XP - 2003/2008 server so that you do not lose data, use soft raid 5 or just use them on there own and use mount folders (disk managment make 2-3 folders and name them and nount them)
     
  4. stevehp

    stevehp New Member

    Joined:
    6 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    The headline is a bit mis-leading from my viewpoint considered they didn't ditch auto backups they ditched auto backups of the backup database. Now the corruption is a bit worrisome I never ran into it with the public beta test, but it's worrisome nonetheless if I ever decide to implement the retail version on my network again.
     
  5. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    101
    The next time someone complains about the linux command line, I'm going to shove that up their...nose :worried:
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page