1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Graphics 3Dmark05 released - Lets see your results.

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by jetsetjimbo, 29 Sep 2004.

  1. Kameleon

    Kameleon is watching you...

    Joined:
    29 Apr 2003
    Posts:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yes, you can save your result on the score screen, then submit the result by right-clicking on the 3DMark05 window at a later date.

    /me waits for Twunka to submit a score that doubles that of any other on the ORB :eyebrow:
     
  2. barry_n

    barry_n What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    24 Aug 2004
    Posts:
    338
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. Leeum

    Leeum What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    2,494
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thought i'd give the new ATi Hotfix a try, first thing i noticed was artifact heaven. Switched back to 4.9 Control Centre and it's not artifacting. My highest score is 2736, specs in sig.
     
  4. scotty6435

    scotty6435 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    4 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,386
    Likes Received:
    0
    Woop, 934 :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash:

    I hate my 5900XT..... roll on a £300 beauty! :rock:
     
  5. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    10,108
    Likes Received:
    682
  6. TMM

    TMM Modder

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    2
    twunka@owned.bit-tech.net /me thinks :p

    hehe just kidding. there was some project on ORB which had an athlon detected as 12000mhz and the 3dmark scored was massivly inflated for some reason. Maybe its detecting something wrong on twunka's comp?
    which brings me to the point, why would you calculate a score purely on specs of a comp?
     
  7. Kameleon

    Kameleon is watching you...

    Joined:
    29 Apr 2003
    Posts:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    8
    You wouldn't, 3DMark score is based purely on the Game tests, and the CPU score is based purely on the CPU tests.
     
  8. TMM

    TMM Modder

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    2
    yeh I know. its just weird that all the fps and such in the ORB page was pretty normal, except its had the athlonxp detected as 12ghz, and the 3dmark score was massive. all the fps, graphics clocks etc seemed normal.
    I don't think it was a "fake" score, i think 3dmark just went mad :eyebrow:
     
  9. TheCleaner

    TheCleaner Back again...

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    woo hoo.. so did you all enjoy that powerpoint presenation.. :worried: oh wait.. that was a benchmark !!! :eyebrow:

    [​IMG]

    spec link in sig

    when that canyon flight (moby dick thing) first came on, i thought it was final fantasy 9, where theyr escaping from the black waltz
     
    Last edited: 3 Oct 2004
  10. Pygo

    Pygo Rick Relixed

    Joined:
    26 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    8
    I'm guessing my Intel Extreme 2 64meg graphics card on my laptop won't be happy. Assuming it can actually run the test of course :waah:
    the geforce fx 5600 128 meg I've got won't be too happy either me thinks :(
     
  11. TMM

    TMM Modder

    Joined:
    12 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    2
    i don't think an inschmell extreme 64mb would even have have Pixel Shader 2.0 :D
     
  12. Austin

    Austin Minimodder

    Joined:
    16 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    15
    :dremel: The latest Intel integrated gfx (GMA900) on the Intel 900 series mobos is a big step forward and can even beat the old ATI 9100IGP, and not just because it is DX9 vs DX8. Still if you play any real games an add-in card makes much more sense. 9800Pro are £120ish and using 3Dmark03 as a guide you'd score over 5000 instead of just 1500 of the GMA900. Unfortunately the Intel EG2 (Extreme Gfx 2) is comparable to SiS651 so way slower than nF2's IGP (GF4MX/GF2) while even a lowly Rad9200 or FX5200 are way faster.

    http://www.sfftech.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=563

    http://graphics.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030903/integrated_graphics-13.html

    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1617353,00.asp
     
  13. Pygo

    Pygo Rick Relixed

    Joined:
    26 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    8
    lets just see if my laptop meats the system requirements :D

    lets see... I need a 2ghz or higher.. nope.. tis a 1.5 pentium-m (although it is supposed to perform around a 2.2 to a 2.4ghz p4 with no ht)
    512 ram.. check (minus 32 or 64 shared)
    about 80 megs free hdd space (I've partitioned a whole bunch and didn't think I'd need that much, but I do have about 8 gigs of music taking up some of that :eek: ) I need about 1.5 gigs, or at least it claims
    win xp, no sp2, other than that up2date
    I got dx9c :)
    64 meg vid card :( (says I need a 128 meg... oh well.. at least I can poke fun at a friend who has a geforce 4 ti 4200 64 meg :D)

    downloading it right now. will let you know how it goes asap :D in about an ahour and 42 mins :(

    EDIT:
    Can't run it :waah:
    [​IMG]
    I am using the drivers that came on the cd though... that might be it :idea:
    I dougt it though. Later tonight I should have a score. :)
     
    Last edited: 5 Oct 2004
  14. monkeyville

    monkeyville Evilish Monkey ++;

    Joined:
    3 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    1,895
    Likes Received:
    6
    Quality quote :thumb:

    Think i got about 2500 with P4 2.8 and 9800 pro. I'm happy with that. Now to run 03 and make myself feel better
     
  15. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    14,085
    Likes Received:
    2,451
    a directX 9 card is required, not just directX 9 installed
     
  16. Pygo

    Pygo Rick Relixed

    Joined:
    26 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    2,179
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yeah, I pretty much figured that. ah well.. I never bought my laptop for gaming anyways. I have started installing 3dmark 05 on my main comp now... I shall post back with results

    EDIT: rats.. I have dx 9.0b :miffed:
    The benchmark will most likely have to wait till I get home from work today.
     
    Last edited: 6 Oct 2004
  17. bimy

    bimy What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    5 Oct 2004
    Posts:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    I just launched 3Dmark05 and scored 3590 :worried:
    Check out my score.
    I think its pretty high as I'm only running an AMD 1800+ and 256DDR Ram :waah:
     
  18. jetsetjimbo

    jetsetjimbo Up-up and away

    Joined:
    19 Feb 2003
    Posts:
    2,935
    Likes Received:
    0
    A 6800 GT will do that for you. :)

    Are you using the hotfix to build 110 as well?
     
  19. Ds3

    Ds3 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    20 May 2004
    Posts:
    278
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's cos it's a graphics based benchmark and is pretty much completely dependant on the graphics card and not the rest of the system!

    Although I have to say even then I'm suprised you did that well! :)
     
  20. bimy

    bimy What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    5 Oct 2004
    Posts:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm updating the drivers of my GT at the moment. I'm still running the ones that came on the CD. I'm gonna try to run it again and see if I get better results :)

    Edit: ok, I launched 3Dmark05 again and scored 3611 this time... <score>
    might be because I didn't warm up my graphics card :eyebrow: (lol).
     
    Last edited: 6 Oct 2004
Tags:

Share This Page