1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News 1337 police hack Tony Blair's PC

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by WilHarris, 22 Jan 2007.

  1. WilHarris

    WilHarris Just another nobody Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Jun 2001
    Posts:
    2,679
    Likes Received:
    2
  2. samkiller42

    samkiller42 For i AM Cheesecake!!

    Joined:
    25 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    538
    The security for PC's is probably as low down as the other things this county needs, Health, Education, Transport etc etc, so this is not surprising that someone can get in.

    Sam
     
  3. DougEdey

    DougEdey I pwn all your storage

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    13,933
    Likes Received:
    33
    Go police! Corruption is the order of the day by the sounds of it, now they just need to hack into companies records.
     
  4. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    S'not really hacking if they just went to the physical computer and retrieved the info they needed, now is it? Maturity in headlines isn't too much to ask for ;)

    As for personal security on a machine, there is little that a noob could use that would deter the police. You need some fairly hefty stuff to keep them from getting info out you have to be very anal about keeping it clean. Not the sort of stuff a PM would have time for.
     
  5. Mother-Goose

    Mother-Goose 5 o'clock somewhere

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    3,890
    Likes Received:
    6
    Its not data theft either, the police have (and need) the right to access the information. It is just digital questioning where the answers are less likely to be lies. I fully support this kind of investigation.
     
  6. cpemma

    cpemma Ecky thump

    Joined:
    27 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    55
    Not so much hacking as undelete software. Eavesdropping on the PM is done by MI5, not CID. ;)
     
  7. mikeuk2004

    mikeuk2004 What you Looking at Fool!

    Joined:
    3 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    3,293
    Likes Received:
    11
    If only the queen would sack Tony and and do away with parliment all together. :)
     
  8. Silence

    Silence What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    8 Aug 2002
    Posts:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm assuming the computer experts were computer forensic experts, or any evidence they find would probably be laughed out of court. Computer forensics requires specific protocols/techniques to be met in order to ascertain continuity of evidence (to stop tampering accusations).

    It seems that security isn't an issue at all, the experts were allowed access (and rightly so!). As has been pointed out, the only security speedbumps would be if partial or full disk encryption was used, although i suspect that, unless the PM wants to block the investigation (not a smart move), any passwords needed would be freely given.
     
  9. Lazarus Dark

    Lazarus Dark Minimodder

    Joined:
    14 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    360
    Likes Received:
    0
    Over here, across the pond, we have people whose only job is covering stuff up, especially in the white house. Could I just walk in over there and sit down at tony's computer or what? I'm a little disappointed in the world's most big brothered nation. You'd think with a camera on every corner, you guys would lock down your leaders email a little better.
     
  10. yodasarmpit

    yodasarmpit Modder

    Joined:
    27 May 2002
    Posts:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    237
    Do you honestly think your average Joe would be able to gain access to the PM's data? I would hazzard a guess at it being the most secure system in the Country.
     
  11. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,139
    Likes Received:
    382
    if he did the crime he will do the time :D
     
  12. randosome

    randosome Banned

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    now if only they would plant some child pornography or something on it so he gets locked away forever, id even donate £10 for that :p
    Its a bit worrying when the prime minister has such naff security though
     
  13. Silence

    Silence What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    8 Aug 2002
    Posts:
    190
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think people are misreading the article, it doesn't say that the PM has naff security, it's saying that the techniques used to access the PM's email have not been reported.

    I think it's safe to assume that the PM will have good security on his computer, let alone access to the study that the computer is sat in. The 'computer experts' will undoubtedly have been given any passwords and clearance needed to do their job and recover any/all email.

    Oh, and the comment about planting child pornography i'm going to assume is a joke, albeit a rather unfunny one.
     
    Last edited: 22 Jan 2007
  14. samkiller42

    samkiller42 For i AM Cheesecake!!

    Joined:
    25 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    538
    Ok, he may be our PM, but as it says he is an email n00b, and there fore would most likley have Norton to protect his PC, and basicly, that says it all :duh:

    Sam
     
  15. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    Some realism guys. He may be a noob, but you can be damn sure there are entire departments of government people who's job is solely to secure government computers, including the PM's. Just as managing directors don't get hacked if they're noobs, PM's won't get hacked either.
     
  16. Burnout21

    Burnout21 Mmmm biscuits

    Joined:
    9 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    8,616
    Likes Received:
    197
    first off as said there was no 'hack', just some hack down at the news room made it sound better.


    MY real worry is the fact that the police are investigating are government! What if there is a potentional 'water gate' again??!!!



    I am very worried atm.
     
  17. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,571
    Likes Received:
    168
    My worry would be if the police weren't investigating the government. I think it's outstanding that our police have approached this openly and properly. Labour have managed to sully themselves by putting pressure on the investigation, but the police have handled it extremely well so far I reckon - and unlike so many countries where a cash-for-honours type thing would be swept under the carpet or just accepted as part of politics, here you've got the police arresting people who might be guilty of crimes.

    Makes me glad to live in this country.
     
  18. Tyinsar

    Tyinsar 6 screens 1 card since Nov 17 2007

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2006
    Posts:
    2,287
    Likes Received:
    28
    Somehow I can't imagine state secrets (or dealings with North Korea and such) being discussed via e-mail (not by the current generation anyway) so I suspect there hasn't been any serious attempt to make it more secure.
     
  19. randosome

    randosome Banned

    Joined:
    17 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    i think that sums it up pretty well, i doubt he would be discussing confidential, and important matters via email
     
  20. cpu121

    cpu121 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    25 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    327
    Likes Received:
    0
    Technically wouldn't this come under GCHQ's remit? Wouldn't be surprised if they copied the emails while in transit. :worried:
     
    Last edited: 23 Jan 2007
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page