1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

7200.9 FINALLY!!!

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Pookeyhead, 16 Oct 2005.

  1. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468
    New Seagate finally on sale locally... about bloody time too!!!
     
  2. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    Hoo-boy are they expensive, but it sure would be nice to have. Till the price comes down I'll probably stick to the 300GB/16MB Maxtors, which run about $130 (in the states) vs the $400 or so they're asking for this one. I figure the extra potential transfer speed isn't worth the price, I'd get another 400 gigs or so for the same price by getting three of the Maxtors.

    Product line makes no sense imo, they go from ATA/100 2MB cache to SATAII-300 16MB cache...
     
  3. IanW

    IanW Grumpy Old Git

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    792
    I have to agree that it would be better to get 3 250Gb drives for similar money,
    but I've been reading that Seagate are offering a 5-year warranty on the 7200.9 drives.
    (When some other manufacturers only offer 12 months!)

    Although the couple of UK dealers I've just looked at only offer the 500Gb drive, this range goes down to 80Gb.
    (Link to Seagate's product page)
     
  4. Highland3r

    Highland3r New Member

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2003
    Posts:
    7,553
    Likes Received:
    16
    WD's sataII 16mb drives are only 90 odd quid for a 250 gigger raid 0 2 of them, you've got much better performance thna a single 7200.9 for less money.
    Ok its 2 drives but still....
     
  5. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    168
    Just a quick note to say that if you're going to use it, 300GB HDDs tend to be about £5 cheaper per 100GB then 250GB HDD's in the UK right now. The 300's are in the sweetspot.
     
  6. EarlGrey

    EarlGrey New Member

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've seen the 500GB models on sale for about a week now, but no sign of the lower GB models. Where could they be?
     
  7. MrWillyWonka

    MrWillyWonka Chocolate computers galore!

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    5,892
    Likes Received:
    12
    That's right. You should really base price PER GB as its easier to determine value. I bought two 300GB HDDs at 39p per gig (or £39 per 100gig). That was back in March, now you can get 300GB's for less than 33p per gig).

    To compare, The 500GB seagate will cost you 52p per gig and a 250GB will cost about 35p per gig. 300gigs are in the "Sweetspot" for now.
     
  8. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,848
    Likes Received:
    468

    yeah but a year guarantee and speeds almost rivalling the raptor are not to be sneezed at.. you get what you pay for. The 5 year guarantee is worth it alone IMO
     
  9. hitman012

    hitman012 Active Member

    Joined:
    6 May 2005
    Posts:
    4,877
    Likes Received:
    19
    Definitely. I'm in the market for a new drive and I think that the good experiences I've had with Seagate (as well as their huge warranty) justify the premium.
     
  10. buzz_lips

    buzz_lips New Member

    Joined:
    13 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Slightly off topic, but has anyone with one of newer drives seen good performance. Just wonder if this 16mb cache really makes much of a difference?
     
  11. dire_wolf

    dire_wolf Last Of The Dovakhiin

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2002
    Posts:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    21
    not had one hands on, but it is supposed to be incredibly nippy.

    For most people (myself included) the noise (or lack of) this thing makes is the main selling point, it'll be perfect for the next project i have in mind.
     
  12. webbyman

    webbyman Hax.

    Joined:
    7 Oct 2004
    Posts:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    0
    all i can say is if you choose a maxtor over a seagate even if the maxtor is for less money your hopping on one leg and shooting yourself in the foot.
     
  13. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    12,935
    Likes Received:
    1,209
    all I can say is that I have had dozens of maxtor drives and had one fail, and have had dozens of seagate drives and had one fail :eyebrow:
     
  14. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    168
    Not really, I paid £100 for my Maxtor Maxline III, a Seagate of equivelent status would have been £115, both came with 5 year warrenties, both came with 16MB cache, but the maxtor was cheaper, and was rated as being better by storage review.
     
  15. Shadowed_fury

    Shadowed_fury Active Member

    Joined:
    21 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    7,506
    Likes Received:
    21
    Too right, Seagate anyday over Maxtor.
    Maxtor are known to fail so much more than Seagates.

    Right now, if I had to pick a drive, i'd be buying Seagate or Samsung, no question about price.
     
  16. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    12,935
    Likes Received:
    1,209

    what im saying is, ive had a single maxtor fail and a single seagate fail, and have had dozens of each (maybe even a few more maxtor, but whos counting)


    no question about price? fujitsu any time ;)
     
  17. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    I've used drives from each of the "big three", only brand I've had fail is a Seagate. Got it replaced, no problem with any drive since. Oldest working drive I have is a Maxtor (some old 13gb thing I bought used). So far it totals up to a 300/16 Maxtor (Maxline III), 2x 80/8 Seagate, 1x 80/8 WD, 2x 36/8 WD Raptor, and looking into another 300/16 Maxline III.

    Overall pretty good experience with all of them, each have their own benefits imo, I choose what fits the situation best.

    buzz_lips - yep, the extra cache does seem to give the drive a snappier feeling. Keeping your drive well-defragged helps more, but it helps a bit.
     
  18. MrWillyWonka

    MrWillyWonka Chocolate computers galore!

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2004
    Posts:
    5,892
    Likes Received:
    12
    Well, maxtors are generally known for failing a bit, I know a friend who has had 4 maxtors fail in less than 2 weeks. Crazy as it might be but that's what happened, however maxtor do have an excellent returns procedure and you get can get a replacement drive extremely quickly. I personally never had a drive fail on me :rock: but would rather go with seagate rather than maxtor.
     
  19. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    168
    Hmm, all drives fail, I've had 4 maxtors, one of which failed but it was a year after its warrenty ended, so 4 years isnt bad for a drive.

    Redundency or backups are the only sure thing when it comes to not losing data in hard drive failures, you can't just pick a brand and be sure that it's going to last.
     
  20. Leeum

    Leeum New Member

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    2,494
    Likes Received:
    1
    I've had 3 Maxtors, none of have failed or had any problems :)
     

Share This Page