1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News AMD’s tri-core Phenom – more than meets the eye

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 4 Dec 2007.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    Tim S, 4 Dec 2007
    #1
  2. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    wait.. what?
     
    kenco_uk, 4 Dec 2007
    #2
  3. steveo_mcg

    steveo_mcg New Member

    Joined:
    26 May 2005
    Posts:
    5,841
    Likes Received:
    80
    :confused:
    I suppose it'll clear up closer to release time but.. wtf??
     
    steveo_mcg, 4 Dec 2007
    #3
  4. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,128
    Likes Received:
    375
    same boat..... :confused:
     
    DXR_13KE, 4 Dec 2007
    #4
  5. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    The tri-core chips might be a completely different chip to the current quad-core Phenoms, but then there are other things which point to it being the same chip. It introduces a shed load of questions about what all of these codenames are for.
     
    Tim S, 4 Dec 2007
    #5
  6. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,128
    Likes Received:
    375
    wait... i got it..... "more than meats the eye", they are transformers and the code names are their real names......
     
    DXR_13KE, 4 Dec 2007
    #6
  7. [USRF]Obiwan

    [USRF]Obiwan New Member

    Joined:
    9 Apr 2003
    Posts:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    5
    me: doing his confused look...
     
    [USRF]Obiwan, 4 Dec 2007
    #7
  8. Mister_Tad

    Mister_Tad Will work for nuts Super Moderator

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    12,749
    Likes Received:
    1,082
    They may well run out of integers for model names if this is the case.
     
    Mister_Tad, 4 Dec 2007
    #8
  9. Redbeaver

    Redbeaver The Other Red Meat

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2006
    Posts:
    2,060
    Likes Received:
    34
    rofl.... yeah transformers...

    tbh im with these guys' boat... have no clue. EXCEPT i now understand AMD's 45nm quad-core with shared L3 = Deneb. thats all i need to know lol.
     
    Redbeaver, 4 Dec 2007
    #9
  10. Hugo

    Hugo Ex-TrustedReviews Staff

    Joined:
    25 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    1,384
    Likes Received:
    19
    I love writing for a less techy site sometimes - codename free writeup :D

    linkage
     
    Hugo, 4 Dec 2007
    #10
  11. wyx087

    wyx087 Homeworld 3 is happening!!

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,747
    Likes Received:
    256
    wait, AMD's newly developed 3 core CPU uses the same amount of power as my over 2 month old 4 core CPU??

    god, AMD, do try to keep up
     
    wyx087, 4 Dec 2007
    #11
  12. steveo_mcg

    steveo_mcg New Member

    Joined:
    26 May 2005
    Posts:
    5,841
    Likes Received:
    80
    Not being funny, but does intel still use a north bridge for the memory controller? If so then of course the AMD cpu power consumption is going to be higher... the intel chip simply off loads some of the heat to a separate chip
     
    steveo_mcg, 4 Dec 2007
    #12
  13. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    As Steveo mentions, the north bridge uses considerably less power on an AMD platform than it does on an Intel platform because the biggest heat-generator (the Memory Controller) is inside the CPU. Also, don't directly compare TDPs - Intel uses 'typical' and AMD uses TDP-max. :)
     
    Tim S, 4 Dec 2007
    #13
  14. Clocked

    Clocked Yar! It be drivin' me nuts...

    Joined:
    11 May 2004
    Posts:
    525
    Likes Received:
    2
    So the processors will have the cores on them but just disabled, I don't get it - why? Surely its a bit of a waste if they are there...
     
    Clocked, 4 Dec 2007
    #14
  15. Nexxo

    Nexxo * Prefab Sprout – The King of Rock 'n' Roll

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    34,079
    Likes Received:
    1,597
    My head hurts...
     
    Nexxo, 4 Dec 2007
    #15
  16. Bladestorm

    Bladestorm New Member

    Joined:
    14 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    698
    Likes Received:
    0
    Presumably initial stock at least will be processors which have come out of the manufacturing process with a fault on one core, so they disable that faulty one and sell it at a reduced price.
     
    Bladestorm, 4 Dec 2007
    #16
  17. Ben

    Ben New Member

    Joined:
    11 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    1,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    So they can sell off faulty quad core chips as a dual or triple core chips rather than binning them, but then i dont know how the triple core chips can have ddr2/3 support when quad core chips only have ddr3. so... ???
     
    Ben, 4 Dec 2007
    #17
  18. ssj12

    ssj12 Member

    Joined:
    12 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    688
    Likes Received:
    1
    so from what I can tell... AMD is releasing these by the time that the QX6850 will be around $500 USD.. honestly not to impressed by AMD's planning. Figured they would release something stronger asap.
     
    ssj12, 4 Dec 2007
    #18
  19. kenco_uk

    kenco_uk I unsuccessfully then tried again

    Joined:
    28 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    9,696
    Likes Received:
    308
    Is it Tri-Core because there'll be effectively three different cores on one chip?

    Tbh, it sounds like a pretty mean feat of engineering.
     
    kenco_uk, 4 Dec 2007
    #19
  20. Woodstock

    Woodstock So Say We All

    Joined:
    10 Sep 2006
    Posts:
    1,783
    Likes Received:
    2
    tri-core is a we can do this but intel cant
     
    Woodstock, 5 Dec 2007
    #20
Page 1 of 2
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page