1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware Asus ROG Strix Z270F Gaming Review

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Dogbert666, 4 Jan 2017.

  1. Dogbert666

    Dogbert666 *Fewer Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    17 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    121
  2. IanW

    IanW Grumpy Old Git

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2003
    Posts:
    6,440
    Likes Received:
    318
    According to Asus' press release, the Strix Z270I Gaming is the new Impact.
     
  3. Combatus

    Combatus Bit-tech Modding + hardware reviews Staff Super Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2009
    Posts:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    63
    We haven't seen anything to specifically say the Impact isn't happening. It usually gets released a month or two after a chipset launch and our thinking is the ROG Strix Z270I Gaming is a replacement for the Z170i Pro Gaming. We've asked Asus for some clarity however and will report back!
     
  4. Vault-Tec

    Vault-Tec Green Plastic Watering Can

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2015
    Posts:
    8,559
    Likes Received:
    690
    Having been on RGB LEDs for nearly a decade I can say they do absolutely nothing for me. Having said that this is easily one of the best looking motherboards I have yet seen, so congratulations Asus.
     
  5. jinq-sea

    jinq-sea The Double Insulates Super Moderator

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,096
    Likes Received:
    371
    It's lovely, isn't it. I can't help feeling that everything has 'gone all big' again though - I'd love to see this level of attention lavished on ITX stuff by manufacturers (oh, and mATX at a push too :hehe:).
     
  6. bagman

    bagman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    3,654
    Likes Received:
    77
    Did you guys bend one of the pins for the I/O front panel connector? Just looking at the last photo.
     
  7. maverik-sg1

    maverik-sg1 Member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    357
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have one of these and it took my 7600K to 5.1ghz using 1.34v but I have to use AVX clock down -2 to 4.9ghz, it's possible to get 5ghz with AVX (LLC +4).

    With AVX at 5ghz even using Arctic Liquid Freezer 360 AIO cooler, core temps rose to 87 degrees using OCCD stress testing - dropping AVX to -2 allowed me to get the higher clock for non-AVX stability.

    Latest BIOS has a 5ghz OC button which works but overvolts like a bitch to gain the result (1.44v).

    Which brings me to the only issue I have now with this board (even with latest BIOS) is I have speedstep enabled (down clocks when idle or on low loads) but can't enable to adjustable voltage as it pumps (unecessarily) up to 1,44v into the cpu under load, not sure if setting LLC to auto fixes this, but OC with AV?X at 4.9ghz is unstable without it (might try a 4.8ghz avx with no LLC see if that helps but thinkthis is hard coded setting in BIOS).

    Side note - on my previous set-up 4.8ghz i5 2500K gives 320s in Terragen4 benchmark, 5.1ghz i5 7600K gives 218s which is a reasonable improvement and as such I feel this was money well spent - I think I would of been disappointed had I upgraded sooner.

    I've not gone for an M2 upgrade yet - but think that will be the next thing I go for.
     
  8. maverik-sg1

    maverik-sg1 Member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    357
    Likes Received:
    1
    Just tried no LLC and SVID enabled - same result 1.44v under load when stable OC is 1.34v and temps comfortable under triple rad Arctic Liquid Freezer 360 AIO cooler.
     
  9. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    It's not afaik
     
  10. TheMadDutchDude

    TheMadDutchDude The Flying Dutchman

    Joined:
    23 Aug 2013
    Posts:
    4,664
    Likes Received:
    506
    The impact will be rebranded under the STRIX brand instead.
     
  11. Vault-Tec

    Vault-Tec Green Plastic Watering Can

    Joined:
    30 Aug 2015
    Posts:
    8,559
    Likes Received:
    690
    There is an ITX. OC3D reviewed it today.

    Just don't come back complaining to me that I made you spend your money :D :D
     
  12. maverik-sg1

    maverik-sg1 Member

    Joined:
    18 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    357
    Likes Received:
    1
    Back to my overvolting using SVID and speedstep.

    Very happy to get some quick support advice from Asus (on their forums)

    To use SVID correctly, instead of using Offset voltage, switch to adaptive, set offset to auto, adaptive to 0.265v and leave LLC at auto - in testing the voltages better (1.345 OCCD load) - CPU temps are better (under extreme load OCCD or Prime) but not as good as disabling SVID and using offset voltage.

    However, in real world computing (games, encoding etc...) I now have 5.1ghz OC (settled for 4.9ghz AVX for 24/7) and adaptive clocks and volts dependent on CPU loads.
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page