Photos Cool Image. :)

Found this on the net tonight.



LOL

 

HAHAHAHHAHAHA I agree P2P and torrents save the earth

 

That is actually a very good point.

 

robin hood was a communist. jesus was a communist. pirates are communists. america doesn't like communists. does america like jesus?

 

Although the message cannot be condoned it is quite funny.

 

What about the extra fuel burned to generate the electricity need to enable file sharing? :B

 

What about the Extra Fuel burned to make Disks and Print the Labels and Make the Boxes. Then move them from the factory to stores. etc....

It use 100X fuel than file sharing And you can save your money too hehehehe

Awesome point buddy.

 

This would be less than the amount of energy taken to produce the disk let alone the whole kit and kaboodle, then factor in the transport of the disk from factory to wholesaler, then to retailer, then add the electricity used by the wholesaler and the retailer (lights, heating/cooling, their computer system, coffee machine etc) and it would be a lot more than your home PC would use to download the same data.

 

It maybe should be Steam helps stop global warming. and we should egt more and more games on it

 

Oh, no doubt, for a single house hold there's no contest.

But when you consider that most popular things have quite a few peers, EG, some of the more popular DVD rips have 2000+ peers, that's 2000 households at least. Not including the server that tracks the torrent (Although that's not essential).

Not saying they're all like that - But the more popular 'new' ones are not far off

 

Man lot of post already lol. Yeh. Save $$ Gas costs are so high now days. BUT the fancy packaging is fun it look at at the start and you dont get it if you download sumthing lol.

 

That doesn't matter, it just means that 2000 people have downloaded (or will have once they all finish downloading it) the data and each has used less resources than if they had bought it in the shops.

 

Even so - There is still quite a high cost on the energy front. Exchanges require power, say there's 900 households (Assuming there are more than two people in some houses), they won't all be on the same exchange, so say something like 200 exchanges, then somewhere there's a server that's tracking the torrent (Or is likely to be), which is likely to be in a server farm.

Admittedly, they'd be doing that anyway, but a mail order hard copy is in the same boat - Posties delivery daily anyway, so they're not using any more or any less fuel for a DVD or CD for you.

I'm not trying to say that there are more fuel costs involved in downloading - Just that there are quite a few that're not always considered.

 

Thanks Krikkit wasnt to shore how to put the video into a post like that.

 

I didn't think it was funny. Moot and childish logic.

Am I the only one who doesn't think they are high enough? Modern day cars using modern day gasoline still costs the same as it did 15 years ago.

 

Gas prices have gone up here thay are at $2.10 a Liter it got up to $2.19, couple years ago it was about $1.50 a Liter. Wish i could go back in time to them days got my gas for your $$ and more laps in town lol.

 

Another argument for piracy:

The less money celebrities make, the less crazy messed up stuff they will do, which will also reduce the pollution of the minds of so many influencial fans.

It's like a big happy snowball, that just gets happier, softer & fluffier as it rolls along!

 

LOL yeh

 

so you're saying that modern low-consumption cars burn better quality fuel more efficiently than old gas guzzlers were burning (lower?) quality fuel back in the days? Therefore, money wise, it costs about the same in the end for the consumer ?

 

Well in the UK, we pay roughly 300% of what you pay in the US, and the prices have gone up 50% in the last couple of years...