1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Other Faster than the speed of light?

Discussion in 'General' started by tristanperry, 22 Sep 2011.

  1. tristanperry

    tristanperry Minimodder

    Joined:
    22 May 2010
    Posts:
    922
    Likes Received:
    41
  2. SuicideNeil

    SuicideNeil What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    5,983
    Likes Received:
    345
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Very cool though, especially if they could scale it up to propel an object faster than light..
     
  3. Blazza181

    Blazza181 SVM PLACENTA CASEI

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    3,429
    Likes Received:
    329
    This sounds epic. I could get from school to home in no time.

    Aww yea.:rock:
     
  4. Cerberus90

    Cerberus90 Car Spannerer

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    7,647
    Likes Received:
    184
    Scale what up?
    Scaling up the LHC would probably require a larger planet to build it on to propel an object. Its huge as it is, and that's just for accelerating things you can't even see, :D

    Also, I'd be willing to bet that its something to do with the structure of the Neutrinos, in as much as they pretty much have no mass.
    I doubt much else could do this.
     
  5. thehippoz

    thehippoz What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    19 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    5,780
    Likes Received:
    174
    sounds wrong though.. probably a calibration mistake

    if they exceeded the speed of light- there's the issue with time too
     
  6. Cerberus90

    Cerberus90 Car Spannerer

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    7,647
    Likes Received:
    184
    Not if the value we have for the speed of light is wrong.

    Or if something else that is believed to be fact is wrong.

    I mean, what happens if the LHC find that there's no Higgs Boson particle. Might aswell go back to the drawing board then. :D
     
  7. Trance

    Trance Two steps forward, one step back

    Joined:
    6 May 2009
    Posts:
    618
    Likes Received:
    32
    You just need to harness a quantum tunnel with an FTL factor of 36.7 recurring. Easy really.
     
  8. Nexxo

    Nexxo * Prefab Sprout – The King of Rock 'n' Roll

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    34,713
    Likes Received:
    2,154
    Next: a Portal Gun! :D

    Neutrinos do have a tiny mass as they go an eensy-weensy bit slower than light. We know that because they experience passage of time. We know that because they change state, and they need time for that to do in.
     
  9. Psycho

    Psycho Average

    Joined:
    15 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,275
    Likes Received:
    221
    Pic removed.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 23 Sep 2011
    Blazza181 likes this.
  10. Blazza181

    Blazza181 SVM PLACENTA CASEI

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    3,429
    Likes Received:
    329
    Oh, I wish. Imagine how much fun you could have with those:

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Krikkit

    Krikkit All glory to the hypnotoad! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    23,785
    Likes Received:
    551
    The SoL has been measured so many times that it's not wrong. End of.

    What could be wrong is the idea that nothing can travel faster than it. If there are particles out there which fundamentally ruin the ideas we have about them then the theories will be rewritten, just as they have been before. If there's no Higgs to be found then the theories will quite literally go back to the drawing board.

    Theoretical physics really is just maths-based guesstimation backed up by ridiculously expensive projects.
     
  12. <A88>

    <A88> Trust the Computer

    Joined:
    10 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    5,441
    Likes Received:
    25
    I'm half way through Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw's E=MC^2, and I'm not sure if I can be bothered to finish it now.
     
  13. Canon

    Canon Reformed

    Joined:
    19 Jul 2010
    Posts:
    2,961
    Likes Received:
    246
    No mass? Minus mass? :p


    But seriously, puzzling and confusing couldn't be a better thing because if it was all clear cut we'd have a lot less to do.
     
  14. wolfticket

    wolfticket Downwind from the bloodhounds

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    3,483
    Likes Received:
    558
    Damn you Cern. You were meant to give us answers, not more questions :)
     
  15. eddie543

    eddie543 Snake eyes

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    264
    Likes Received:
    23
    No1 rule of having a job don't finish it or you won't have one :lol:
     
  16. Tongue-of-Fire

    Tongue-of-Fire What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    1 Aug 2010
    Posts:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    This made my jaw drop when I first read it. I'd say that it's probably about time for a paradigm shift :hehe:. To be honest though, it's probably some sort of systematic error.
    They're doing a conference later today I think and they're releasing their data to be scrutinised for errors so if people find anything amiss they'll be pretty quick to say so.
     
  17. edintonucretia

    edintonucretia What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    23 Sep 2011
    Posts:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    You were meant to give us answers
     
  18. Edwards

    Edwards Minimodder

    Joined:
    8 Oct 2010
    Posts:
    835
    Likes Received:
    54
    It depends if they are considering distance between the points as absolute, or whether they are taking into consideration movement of the earth while the Neutrinos are between points.

    I'd love this to be true though. Being limited by the speed of light always seemed like a massive dampener on my plans for a teleportation device.
     
  19. vodkas666

    vodkas666 What's a Dremel?

    Joined:
    20 Apr 2011
    Posts:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think I still side with Einstein on this one :) They said that the measured time was fractionally over the time they expected. Could easily be a small mistake with the ruler they were measuring with. Neutrinos have a small mass which has been measured at T2K in Japan although not enough to say conclusively. There have been many experiments to measure the speed of light and it would have been seen already.
     
  20. Da_Rude_Baboon

    Da_Rude_Baboon What the?

    Joined:
    28 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    135
    Why? Not trolling, just interested.

    Einstein's theory is the best fit from what we have observed but it does not mean its correct.
     

Share This Page