1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware G.Skill, Intel & Patriot SSD group test

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 3 Dec 2008.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. HourBeforeDawn

    HourBeforeDawn a.k.a KazeModz

    Joined:
    26 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    6
    Wow that Intel X25-M 80GB SSD is something else but I still dont think the tech is there yet to justify the switch over, sure in Laptops ya we should make the switch now to extend battery life and in other portable devices still using mechanical drives, but as for desktops ya not there yet. Overall still awesome.
     
  3. glaeken

    glaeken Freeeeeeeze! I'm a cawp!

    Joined:
    1 Jan 2005
    Posts:
    2,041
    Likes Received:
    50
    What's the expected lifetime of these drives? Has there been any long term tests of the 1st gen models? Erase-write cycles slowly degrade the memory over time. A quick wiki check tells me that nand flash memory can last for about 100K cycles. This doesn't seem like all that much if you have one of these drives as the main partition with the swap partition.
     
  4. yakyb

    yakyb i hate the person above me

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2006
    Posts:
    2,063
    Likes Received:
    30
    yeah not quite ready for a switch over quite yet but its getting close
     
  5. The Infamous Mr D

    The Infamous Mr D Member

    Joined:
    11 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    147
    Likes Received:
    0
    The technology is certainly very impressive at its best and clearly is the way of the future. But the prohibitive costs and ropey write performance compared to traditional drives mean that SSD's are several years off becoming near ubiquitous in the PC.
     
  6. Baz

    Baz I work for Corsair

    Joined:
    13 Jan 2005
    Posts:
    1,810
    Likes Received:
    92
    exactly. They are the future, of this I have no doubt, but it's going to a long road before they replace the mechanical drive.
     
  7. perplekks45

    perplekks45 LIKE AN ANIMAL!

    Joined:
    9 May 2004
    Posts:
    5,371
    Likes Received:
    166
    I'd say by the end of 2010 I'll start seriously thinking about SSD as my main drives. Before that it seems to be more of a proof of concept. Surely fast and impressive but way overpriced and still with those little flaws that just ruin the fun.
     
  8. B1GBUD

    B1GBUD ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Accidentally Funny

    Joined:
    29 May 2008
    Posts:
    3,222
    Likes Received:
    373
    I'd like to see a comparison of 2 x 10k Raptor in RAID 0 (Striped), compaired with the SSD's
     
  9. Bauul

    Bauul Sir Bongaminge

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    2,173
    Likes Received:
    38
    I actually think this is quite important: all new tech starts of ludicrously expensive and early-adopter centric, and then filters down to be a realistic consumer product much later. Look at DVD Writers: same thing happened. Even the second generation of DVD writers were £500, they're now around £30.

    However, the Intel SSD has proven two things. Firstly that the tech is viable in a consumer product: it works really quite bloody well, and you would certainly not object if someone gave one to you for free. Yes the price is expensive, but is it really that expensive? It's approximately a little over twice as expensive as the best of the Mechanical drives (Raptor), and about five times that of the 1TB drive. Considering second generation of other tech (like the DVD writer) were 10 or 20 times more expensive than the accepted consumer price when they first launched, SSDs are actually coming on very fast, and very cheap. The fact we can even consider this is a replacement for mechanical drives now, only on the second generation, is something to behold. Ignoring the cheaper two SSDs, which are not actual viable products, I say don't slag SSDs for being too expensive, marvell at actually how cheap and how usable they can be.
     
  10. TheCherub

    TheCherub New Member

    Joined:
    16 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    699
    Likes Received:
    9
    It does beg the question, what would a drive have to do speed wise to get 10 out of 10?
     
  11. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    Deliver better-than-mechanical write speeds - read is there, write isn't. :)
     
  12. StephenK

    StephenK Sneak 'em Upper

    Joined:
    21 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    291
    Likes Received:
    2
    Have to say I'm with Bauul on this one. When I see a drive like the intel for 500, I don't think 'dear lord thats crazy expensive', I think 'by the time i build my next PC in a years time :)'. Of course, right now yes they are too expensive but I guess I'm okay with that because I'm not considering them as a purchase at the moment.

    I only use 1 internal drive (320gb) and the ssds will get there soon. The future is indeed bright on the ssd front.
     
  13. Kúsař

    Kúsař regular bit-tech reader

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    317
    Likes Received:
    4
    For 80GB HDD? Yes, it's pretty expensive. And we all are familiar with Intel's pricing system - as long as there is no competition they'll keep prices sky high... I seriously doubt components intel is using are sooo much more expensive than what others use.
     
  14. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    There's a 160GB X25-M on the way at some point early next year, afaik. It'll be interesting to see how Intel's pricing structure works with SSDs, as with processors there are generally set prices and the processors move down the matrix when faster models are released. It'd be nice to see that with the SSDs as well, but it's probably not going to happen.

    Bauul, you make a great point and this was what caused a bit of a heated debate in the office yesterday. Yes, the Intel SSD is expensive, but it works and it works bloody well - at worst, it rivals the mechanical drives and at best it is in a completely different league. Unfortunately, you can't say the same about the other two drives (well, the drive controller at least... since Patriot/G.Skill are doing the best they can with what's available) and that's why they are more affordable - there need to be compromises made along the way if you choose anything but the Intel SSD at the moment. :)
     
  15. Nictron

    Nictron Member

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2007
    Posts:
    118
    Likes Received:
    0
    Veloci Raptor? At that price you might as well include the fasted HDD out there.
     
  16. airchie

    airchie New Member

    Joined:
    22 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    2,136
    Likes Received:
    2
    Since Intel developed their own controller etc they prob have R&D costs to offset.
    They will only get cheaper (and likely faster) from here so can't complain.

    Tim, would LOVE to see more reviews and comparisons with the latest line of SSDs.
    The intel SLC model for one, the OCZ Solid series of drives recently released.
    Also, I found it very interesting reading about the insides of these drives down to PCB level.
    Seeing the G.Skill and Patriot drives were practically identical but one is way cheaper was very informative and useful.

    I have to agree with the comments above about costs.
    I don't think the cost is that bad considering the massive performance gains.
    One interesting comparison I'd like to see is the performance if several cheaper SSDs in raid 0 agains a single Intel bad-boy.
    Cost-wise they would be similar but which would be faster?
    I saw a great article about a guy raiding 9 mtron SSDs and getting FAST transfer speeds.
    So fast in fact that it was the raid controller's processor holding things back.
    Like sustained 800MB/s reads etc.

    So, to sum up,
    MOAR SSD NEWZ PLZ!! :D
     
  17. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
    airchie, there are plans to do plenty more storage-related reviews. :)
     
  18. BIS

    BIS New Member

    Joined:
    3 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about HyperDrives ?

    http://www.hyperossystems.co.uk/

    The pricing of the SATA2 DDR2 HyperDrive5 doesn't look too bad. Does anyone have any experience of or know of any benchmarks for this kind of kit ?
     
  19. [PUNK] crompers

    [PUNK] crompers Dremedial

    Joined:
    20 May 2008
    Posts:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    50
    this is v exciting indeed!

    when i think about upgrading my machine nowadays the only thing that i would like to be quicker is the storage. Basically if you have C2D and 4GB you'll find it difficult to speed up you general computing experience to any great level (even with core i7).

    to me SSD is the next step that is actually worth making for anything other than bragging rights (although i'll certainly be waiting for the prices to come down and the technology to improve)
     
  20. impar

    impar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24 Nov 2006
    Posts:
    3,090
    Likes Received:
    40
    Greetings!

    The 150GB Raptor has the same Burst Speed and Average Read -134MB/s- in HDTach?
    You should have included the VelociRaptor.
     

Share This Page