1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Graphics Minimum GPU for BF3?

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Bloody_Pete, 19 Dec 2011.

  1. Bloody_Pete

    Bloody_Pete Technophile

    Joined:
    11 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    8,441
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    Ello

    As above really. Res is 1920x1200. As cheap as possible...
     
  2. YEHBABY

    YEHBABY RIP Tel

    Joined:
    22 May 2010
    Posts:
    3,635
    Likes Received:
    1,640
  3. feathers

    feathers Minimodder

    Joined:
    11 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    59
  4. chewbaccas_nan

    chewbaccas_nan Minimodder

    Joined:
    27 Jun 2011
    Posts:
    762
    Likes Received:
    11
    Bit tech also has a article on bf3 hardware perforamance. A 560ti or 6950 is probably your best option
     
  5. N17 dizzi

    N17 dizzi Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    3,234
    Likes Received:
    356
    On ultra settings at 1080p there is no single GPU that will run at 60 fps in all circumstances currently. Dual GPU cards (590 etc) maybe.

    For 30 fps with those settings a 580 or maybe a 570 will do but 30 fps in a shooter is a bit meh

    edit: 30 fps minimum that is
     
    Last edited: 19 Dec 2011
  6. Kernel

    Kernel Likes cheese

    Joined:
    29 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    1,195
    Likes Received:
    47
    I get 50-60 fps in BF3 with the MSI 6950 @ Ultra, apart from SSAO instead of HBAO and MSAA turned off.
    I see bugger all difference with those settings, but it's a big FPS gain
     
  7. N17 dizzi

    N17 dizzi Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    3,234
    Likes Received:
    356
    I would like to run MSAA if poss tho the higher the res the less you need it
     
  8. Sexton

    Sexton Minimodder

    Joined:
    2 Jun 2010
    Posts:
    621
    Likes Received:
    19
    I get 50-60fps on High with a couple of bits on Ultra with my OC'd 560 Ti @ 1920x1080
     
  9. Kernel

    Kernel Likes cheese

    Joined:
    29 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    1,195
    Likes Received:
    47
    Seriously, just run FXAA, the difference is tiny in visuals, but the performance hit is large.
     
  10. N17 dizzi

    N17 dizzi Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    3,234
    Likes Received:
    356
    Yeah I get that, but its like I have OCD or something. When I spend £1200 + on a box for playing games I want the best visuals. I hate compromising
     
  11. Kernel

    Kernel Likes cheese

    Joined:
    29 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    1,195
    Likes Received:
    47
    Quad sli then :)
     
  12. yassarikhan786

    yassarikhan786 Ultramodder(Not)

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2011
    Posts:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    49
    A 560 would be sufficient on high at 1080p. There is very little difference between high and ultra, so you won't be missing anything.
     
    Xcellenye likes this.
  13. N17 dizzi

    N17 dizzi Multimodder

    Joined:
    23 Mar 2011
    Posts:
    3,234
    Likes Received:
    356
    Yep :)
     
  14. MrDomRocks

    MrDomRocks Modder

    Joined:
    5 Sep 2011
    Posts:
    5,065
    Likes Received:
    137
    Right now my single GTX 570 none OC'd and just the standard nVidia release runs around around 55-60 fps on high. No issues running BF3 at all and I play every night of the week lol

    But thats £200+ for a GPU!
     
  15. YEHBABY

    YEHBABY RIP Tel

    Joined:
    22 May 2010
    Posts:
    3,635
    Likes Received:
    1,640
    For 50 - 60 fps with all the eye candy on you need a GTX570 or GTX580. Or wait and see what the AMD 7900 series brings in a few days.

    If your willing to turn down the eye candy a GTX560Ti is the absolute minimum I would go.
     
  16. aLtikal

    aLtikal 1338-One step infront of the pro's

    Joined:
    7 May 2008
    Posts:
    944
    Likes Received:
    30
    560ti? I play on low graphics at 1680x1050 smooth no problems with a 5770 1gb. Bit tech over-speccing as usual...

    Sent from Bittech Android app
     
  17. LennyRhys

    LennyRhys Fan Fan

    Joined:
    16 May 2011
    Posts:
    6,414
    Likes Received:
    927
    I played it at ultra settings 1920x1200 with my 470 @ stock and it was amazing. Did plenty tests after getting my 460 and the overclocked 460 (900MHz) actually outperformed the stock 470.

    It seems to me that people have gotten so hung up on frame rates that they have altogether forgotten how to simply play a game and enjoy it. I'm sure Metro was running about 25fps most of the time, but did I care? It looked amazing...
     
  18. Bloody_Pete

    Bloody_Pete Technophile

    Joined:
    11 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    8,441
    Likes Received:
    1,116
    I wanted the most low powered and cheapest card really, not super high end :p My mates gone for a GTX260 as that'll do him till he can afford a better card :)
     
  19. Elton

    Elton Officially a Whisky Nerd

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    Posts:
    8,577
    Likes Received:
    196
    You HD5870 should work out fine.

    Crossfire that thing, HD5870s are quite cheap now.
     
  20. YEHBABY

    YEHBABY RIP Tel

    Joined:
    22 May 2010
    Posts:
    3,635
    Likes Received:
    1,640
    You needed to clarify what you meant by minimum, as it is all relative and each individual will have their own acceptable minimum based on price and performance.

    I used to run bf3 on a GTX280 with settings turned down. But frame rates dipped close to 25. Also card only DX10. My game play has definitely improved though now I get 50+ FPS.
     

Share This Page