1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hardware MSI Click BIOS - Evaluating UEFI

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Guest-16, 11 Jan 2009.

  1. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

  2. DragunovHUN

    DragunovHUN I want to change my name but I also don't

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2008
    Posts:
    5,142
    Likes Received:
    180
    What? That's a BIOS? But... but... it has... COLORS! THATS IMPOSSiBLE! YOU'RE LYING
     
  3. Smilodon

    Smilodon The Antagonist

    Joined:
    25 Mar 2003
    Posts:
    6,244
    Likes Received:
    102
    Oh my...!

    This can't be good. I have seen way to many people mess up their OS. Making the BIOS setup more accessible to the general public is NOT a good idea!


    Oh, and games in BIOS? :duh:
     
  4. quack

    quack New Member

    Joined:
    6 Mar 2002
    Posts:
    5,240
    Likes Received:
    9
    I wish they'd pay someone to write PROPER explanations of what options actually do, instead of too-short broken English attempts at a description.
     
  5. n3mo

    n3mo New Member

    Joined:
    15 Oct 2007
    Posts:
    184
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm not sure if you are aware, but one of the main purposes of designing EFI was "intellectual property protection", it is even feared that it is a straight road to completely locking-out all open-source/free software. Sometimes it was (and still is) called DRM BIOS.

    All current implementations are too primitive to do this, currently it's still more of a BIOS frontend with possible plugins. Basically it's more aimed at "omg-it-has-cute-shiny-windows" vista generation with no real advantages over BIOS.
     
  6. Firehed

    Firehed Why not? I own a domain to match.

    Joined:
    15 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    12,574
    Likes Received:
    16
    Suppose the HD backup tool is a decent thing to have at the BIOS level since every Windows-based tool I've ever tried sucks (and a proper DOS-based version of Ghost is a pain to get running correctly, especially since the advent of SATA drives half a decade ago... I've never understood why something as fragile as Windows is so damn hard to make a working image of), but the rest of it just seems like color for the sake of color. A brushed metal background is the best thing to come from it? Come on.
     
  7. Darkefire

    Darkefire New Member

    Joined:
    8 Sep 2008
    Posts:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Y'know, the only thing I find the current BIOS is missing is a decent explanation of the various options; I don't always have the luxury of a manual to consult when I'm fiddling around. So how is it that they came up with an entirely new modern replacement for the aging BIOS and the only new things to come out of it are tools that aren't going to be used very often, a bunch of shiny colors nobody cares about, and a few games nobody wants to play? Seriously, how hard is it to transcribe your stinking manual into the new program? And I sincerely hope that whoever had the bright idea of putting in a WWII Breakout game with graves in the background was fired.
     
  8. Splynncryth

    Splynncryth 0x665E3FF6,0x46CC,...

    Joined:
    31 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    18
    The translation factor is only one part of the problem. The options usally make sense if you are working off the data sheets for the chipset, or are familiar with the spec the setting affects.

    Pure FUD.
    It looks like the UEFI 2.2 spec is available now, check section 3.4 for some info on how an OS in launched.
    Once the OS is launched, section 7 outlines the runtime services the systme formware makes available to the OS as required by the specification. Beyond that, the system can also produce runtime drivers (as opposed to boot services drivers) for the OS to use if nothingelse is available, and ACPI 3.0 is part of the specification as well.

    UEFI is desperatly needed by the industry. In a nutshell, BIOS is 25 years of hacks to extend something not intended for the current environment. With a few exceptions, there were few specifications to work from. UEFI tried to address problems encountered by BIOS vendors, OEMs, hardware makers, OS authors, etc by providing a set of rules for software abstration, a specification on how the interfaces work, some flexibility to allow companies to solve their own problems, and a forum to provide feedback and make changes to the specification.

    As for teh games, I was curious. I'm not sure where MSI found the programmers familar enough with UEFI to create the software. It looks like another instance of what we see as eastern culture strangeness. Assuming those games are using the standard EFI interfaces, what might be interesting to note is that none of that software should be talking to the hardware as with a DOS game. Instead, it should be using an abstracted software interface and the system firmware is talking to the hardware (still does make the games less of a WTF moment though).
     
    cpemma likes this.
  9. OWNED66

    OWNED66 New Member

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    i read about this a year ago
    why is every one like "WTF"
     
  10. Shuriken

    Shuriken same christmas AV for a whole year

    Joined:
    1 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    1,312
    Likes Received:
    22
    It's a normal BIOS with mouse input and a background image, am I the only one who sees this? :worried:
     
  11. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    Yea but there's more to a page so less scrolling, in-built options for more software and a better resolution. It is normal, but better-normal.
     
  12. ElThomsono

    ElThomsono Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2005
    Posts:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    96
    I dunno, a move away from the familiar chunky blue menu would just annoy me; BIOS is not a happy place :grr:
     
  13. chrisb2e9

    chrisb2e9 Dont do that...

    Joined:
    18 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    4,055
    Likes Received:
    41
    I agree 100%. Most people dont know what they are doing in a bios. adding things like games just invites kids to go in and mess with their parents computer and change things that should not be changed.
    Gee, I wonder what happens when I set the cpu to 1.7V? maybe it will run faster!
     
  14. ParaHelix.org

    ParaHelix.org New Member

    Joined:
    19 Jun 2008
    Posts:
    279
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm all for nice looking user friendly BIOS interfaces but when it comes to games it is a total waste of space.
     
  15. tuaamin13

    tuaamin13 New Member

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    You know, if they ditched the games you think they'd have space for the backup utility?

    Also, do other companies have EFI bios (in production)? I reinstalled a HP Elitebook (8530p) and a Dell E6500 at work and they both had BIOS where you could use the mouse. I presumed that was EFI but I haven't heard any concrete evidence.
     
  16. Jipa

    Jipa Avoiding the "I guess.." since 2004

    Joined:
    5 Feb 2004
    Posts:
    6,363
    Likes Received:
    125
    I've never found myself wondering "If only I could do the bios settings using mouse...". I guess the system could be used for some clever functions in the future, but so far it's just a tech demo with no real value.

    And what the BUCK is going on with the games?!?! MSI just what the hell were you thinking?
     
  17. teamtd11

    teamtd11 *Custom User Title*

    Joined:
    31 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    2,267
    Likes Received:
    30
    Ive just spent x amount of money on a new pc, and should i play crysis? fallout 3?... nah ill play the games in the bios/uefi whatever :p
     
  18. Splynncryth

    Splynncryth 0x665E3FF6,0x46CC,...

    Joined:
    31 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    18
    AFAIK, Dell is not using EFI, The HP might, but I don't know yet. All the Intel Desktop boards have been based on whatever the current EFI revision has been for a while now. You can confirm this by opening their .BIO files and noting that the first 16 bytes are the capsule GUID of 3B6686BD-0D76-4030-B70E-B5519E2FC5A0 (looks like BD 86 66 3B 76 0D 30 40 B7 0E B5 51 9E 2F C5 A0 in the editor).
    So mouse support != EFI. It is just a lot easier because of the EFI_SIMPLE_POINTER_PROTOCOL. It's like saying DOS and Linus are equivalent because of the command line interface both have.


    What you see in what just about everyone called BIOS is just a human-machine interface. BIOS is the code that the CPU executes at reset, beginning with the instructions located at 0xF000:0xFFF0. Now, I can run through a rough list of what BIOS does from this point untill you see the OS load, but even the quick version is long (and tend to be a bit long winded). It also requires some knowledge of PC architecture. You should know what the interrupt vector table is, what the E820 table is as well as the modes of operation the CPU can run in such as protected mode, real mode, and "flat mode". You should have some idea what ACPI is, and system management mode (SMM) is.
    BIOS hides a lot of complexity from the user and even the OS. It's a fairly sophisticated piece of software in its own right. But it was designed around a set of ideas that are no longer valid. These limitations do affect a lot of things in your PC. Again, the industry has worked very hard to hide all this so it does not appear to be a burden. But the resulting hacks and work arounds are a major source of headaches. Take USB booting as an example.

    So it's hard to explain what EFI is unless you really, truly know what BIOS is, and how to interface with it. That text screen you see with the cryptic stuff is only a small tip of the iceberg. All the work it does could be dome from the OS. It's there because you can't always count on there being something to load an OS from.
     
    tuaamin13 likes this.
  19. Hugo

    Hugo Ex-TrustedReviews Staff

    Joined:
    25 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    1,384
    Likes Received:
    19
    And don't forget it's now coded in high-level languages (C/C++/Python/whatever).
     
  20. DanaG

    DanaG New Member

    Joined:
    23 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can confirm, the HP EliteBook laptops definitely do have UEFI. HP lets you enable and use "UEFI Boot Mode" so you can run arbitrary .efi binaries; however, it only seems to support x86-64 efi binaries, not the Fat (Universal) Binaries that things like the rEFIt project like to use because they seem to think EFI ≡ Apple. =þ

    Booting Vista under UEFI boot mode results in broken Intel 5300 (AGN) wireless (Code 10 in Device Manager: "Device Cannot Start").
    Surprisingly enough, video acceleration with my ATI card works fine in both Windows and Linux (binary drivers on both). You'd think Intel, who takes part in designing the standard, would have drivers that work under it.... but nope. In fact, that's the only device I have that doesn't work under UEFI.

    I've gone back to BIOS-based boot mode, however -- broken wireless makes Vista a no-go, and the EFI "Express Boot" menu does not offer a "savedefault" function like Grub (legacy) does.

    HP Services Media Library item: BIOS menu emulator, from the 14" model; the 15" model I have has the same menu structure.
    http://h20181.www2.hp.com/plmconten...868&MEID=5C316DB1-6B5B-4C11-9F68-807A3979A6CE
     
    Last edited: 12 Jan 2009
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page