1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Columns Can you hear me now?

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Tim S, 21 Apr 2007.

  1. Tim S

    Tim S OG

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2001
    Posts:
    18,881
    Likes Received:
    78
  2. oasked

    oasked Stuck in the Mud

    Joined:
    24 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    4,015
    Likes Received:
    55
    Can't they all just move to Canada or somewhere else out of the RIAA's grasp?
     
  3. Spaceraver

    Spaceraver Ultralurker

    Joined:
    19 Jan 2006
    Posts:
    1,363
    Likes Received:
    5
    im glad i dont listen to anyting other than electronic music... most of which are not in the riaa reach anyways
     
  4. DougEdey

    DougEdey I pwn all your storage

    Joined:
    5 Jul 2005
    Posts:
    13,933
    Likes Received:
    33
    I'm afraid that I haven't listened to radio on purpose in years, i.e. only stuff which I cannot control (shops).

    Mainly because I get annoyed by the ads and people talking, I want music and not chat.
     
  5. steveo_mcg

    steveo_mcg New Member

    Joined:
    26 May 2005
    Posts:
    5,841
    Likes Received:
    80
    Thank goodness for the bbc.
    ( You know your old when you listen to bbc radio 2 and drive 406!)
     
  6. DriftCarl

    DriftCarl Member

    Joined:
    2 Nov 2004
    Posts:
    599
    Likes Received:
    12
    such a shame. the RIAA are complete idiots. I hope www.di.fm survives in its current form

    Fair enough, going after people who download illegally, thats fine if they want to do that, as long as they do it properly. But instead of screwing with downloaders, they are now screwing with legitimate consumers who legally listen to internet radio.

    These are the people who havnt broken any laws, pay royalty fees by the law. Count every listener. Nothing what they do is illegal. but the RIAA just cant help themselves but to try and get it shut down.

    Its pathetic. Why cant these students who go round shooting other students actually go into RIAA buildings and do those t**ts instead.
     
    Last edited: 21 Apr 2007
  7. RedBuddies

    RedBuddies New Member

    Joined:
    10 Oct 2005
    Posts:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was wondering the same, afterall RIAA and the like only applies in the US with US artists... no?
     
  8. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    168
    Something I wondered for a while was, why would the RIAA do this? I know I know, they're utter ****wits and are generally just happy to shut people down, but what in this case would be their logic. A comment on Digg provided the answer for me and I'll paraphrase it:

    The RIAA aren't yet ready to do internet radio. That's just not where they're at yet. Internet radio grew far faster than they had anticipated, and it was actually heading to become an area of music that wasn't totaly owned, controlled, and monopolised by them. Sure, it was their music, but neither they nor any of the Big Four were calling the shots.

    So they did the only thing that would seem logical to the RIAA. Destroy the current industry and make it impossible to survive in, until that is, the Big Four and the RIAA are ready to get into Internet radio properly, at which time they'll go into an empty market with almost no competition and can do every single thing on their terms. That's what they like. Their market, their terms, their media, their profits.

    This was a business move to destroy an industry that wasn't theirs in order that they make money from it in the future if they choose to.

    Not only have they destroyed something they don't tend to replace with a better service, but they've destroyed something they might not even bother replacing at all.

    Boycott the RIAA folks.
     
  9. Cthippo

    Cthippo Can't mod my way out of a paper bag

    Joined:
    7 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    6,783
    Likes Received:
    101
    I get my radio by satellite, which has many of the same advantages as internet radio, though with a cost. I pay about $13 a month for the subscription, but I find it worth it because otherwise I can't get the shows I like out here in the sticks.

    Agreed, the RIAA needs to die.
     
  10. severedhead

    severedhead New Member

    Joined:
    19 Dec 2002
    Posts:
    1,479
    Likes Received:
    1
    I never realised a lot of that. Thanks RIAA for stagnating the radio stations. No wonder they're all crap.
     
  11. Lazarus Dark

    Lazarus Dark New Member

    Joined:
    14 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    360
    Likes Received:
    0
    What I've never understood is, why would I buy a cd if the songs on it are being played on every station every twenty minutes? What a waste of money, why not just turn on the free radio? Not that I listen to radio for a long time now. There's not much death metal on radio these days. hehe.
     
  12. Bluephoenix

    Bluephoenix Spoon? What spoon?

    Joined:
    3 Dec 2006
    Posts:
    968
    Likes Received:
    1
    Brilliant article.

    personally I listen to Trance/Dance/Techo so buying CD's is a moot point as most of the artists are international and usually have free downloads for their stuff (most of their money is made on the DJ circuit) the only radio station I actually listen to is an internet radio station from sweden which does only that type of music.

    for humor's sake if you're ever in the states, try going into a bestbuy and asking the music area guy for Trance CDs. (If they get it right I'll eat my underwear)
     
  13. ozstrike

    ozstrike yip yip yip yip

    Joined:
    19 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    2,946
    Likes Received:
    11
    This is ridiculous, they're attacking a market because they didn't think of it themselves in the first place.
    I just hope it doesn't affect last.fm.
     
  14. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    168
    It shouldn't for now, Last.Fm are UK based. However given that US copyright law generally seems to get roughly copied over in the UK after a short time lapse, I expect that internet radio will be murdered here in a few years at most too.
     
  15. Edvuld

    Edvuld New Member

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2005
    Posts:
    230
    Likes Received:
    0

    This article got me started to listen to web radio finally.

    THANK YOU for this link. Hit the spot, already love it!
     
    Last edited: 22 Apr 2007
  16. Krikkit

    Krikkit All glory to the hypnotoad! Super Moderator

    Joined:
    21 Jan 2003
    Posts:
    23,448
    Likes Received:
    368
    Too late tbh, thanks to the RIAA, we could soon see the death of all decent, ad-free (or thereabouts) internet radio.

    The guy from digg is exactly right tbh, the RIAA aren't in control of internet radio, and need to do something about it.

    Great article and some fascinating detail which I've never heard before about US FM radio.
     
  17. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,117
    Likes Received:
    363
    is this a worldwide thing or only limited to the USA?
     
  18. specofdust

    specofdust Banned

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    168
    USA limited. There are no world wide laws.
     
  19. mmorgue

    mmorgue New Member

    Joined:
    16 Feb 2005
    Posts:
    386
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes but are they aware of that?
     
  20. Meanmotion

    Meanmotion bleh Moderator

    Joined:
    16 Nov 2003
    Posts:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    12
    That's what i've always thought was rather perverse about the whole industry. Having the same songs rammed down my throat every five minutes doesn't make me want to buy a record, in fact quite the opposite. I buy if i like, it's really that simple.

    My mate runs an online metal radio station, well it's more of a weekly hour long podcast. He gets several tens of thousands of uniques every month so theoretically there's almost enough for him to make some decent advertising revenue. However, the way podcast royalties work would mean he'd have to pay thousands of pounds a year which would be way more than he'd make. So, for the time being he has to work on a word-of-mouth arrangement with the records companies he deals with that he makes no money so he won't give any money. Seems to me that both of them lose out on that arrangement...

    Anyway, point being. Boo ya sucks!
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page