Gaming Crysis 2 DirectX 11 Patch Analysis

HUH? Where is your proof I/m in the minority? it seems to be accepted everywhere on review sites, forums, anyone you talk to c2 is inferior graphically by a wide margin. Are you related to Yerli? You defend c2 like its dear to you.

No tress in c2 have incredible detail, they are terrible low res 2d sprites.

Digital foundry, leans of truth have detailed breakdowns of why c2 is not near the game graphically as c1. look it up.

The screens don't look any better then any most modern Pc games on high settings, certainly doesn't wow anyone like it did c1 did.

The fact you keep posting here for days trying to argue with anyone who is negative towards c2 is telling.

 

You don't even care about what you are doing, and it shows. You have such a loud mouth for someone who doesn't care, and you are trying to enforce your stupid views on people who do care a lot about playing good games. Makes me wonder why you even bothered registering here. It's like me registering on a Ferrari forum and call them all a bunch of stupid hissy fit nerds because my Renault Clio gets me from A to B just fine.

 

So you crysis 1 fans are the ferrari drivers of this world. I'm impressed. I can see I was really dumb now thinking I could keep up with you on the Autobahn. Let's see how well you do in the city though Mr smarty pants. My Clio can squeeze down the bicycle lane nicely during traffic congestion.

I didn't realise this was a forum for pro crysis gamers. What was I thinking.

" you are trying to enforce your stupid views on people who do care a lot about playing good games." - And of course you and your C1 buddies aren't trying to force your Crysis 2 is **** view on anyone are you?

I personally have gripes when people distort the truth. Someone comes along and says we should stop playing C2 because actually C1 looks better. What a crock of ****!

I'm not going to get into an argument about which game is better to play. Could well be that C1 is a better game, I just don't like it when a group of kiddies conspire to distort the facts and say C1 looks better. I don't care what mods you install for it, the barebones C1 and Warhead are showing their age graphically compared to C2. That is the only issue I have when I see C1 kiddies worshipping the game and saying everything about it is better.

I don't give a **** what game you play or if you regard yourselves as pro gamers. Don't give a ****. Just don't like reading lies about a game.

 

whoa whoa whoa it's just people's opinions feathers.. looks like you have a nice system- if you enjoy playing crysis 2 on it who gives a ****.. you paid for it.. if your happy then what does it matter =]

I'm happy with my system, but an enthusiast like yourself would probably have a different look with your vibrating chair and gadgets

do I care? didn't think crysis 2 graphics were bad at all- it was more the gameplay

don't worry about what people think.. it's a lot like fallout 3.. people didn't like fallout 3 because of system shock nostalgia

 

I was kind of joking around when I was bragging about the hardware. I do use the vibration and the SLI setup is fairly recent. Doesn't matter to me what hardware people use. I don't mind the C2 gameplay but then I haven't completed it yet. I guess we get different things from games. When I played Portal 2, I liked it but I noticed that Portal 1 had some very complex puzzles compared to the sequel. Some said Portal 2 was dumbed down for console release. Perhaps so but overall it was still entertaining. I kind of feel the same way about C2. But I get that some people play a game to a greater level (some of my friends are in various gaming clans). I personally never wanted to play a game to that degree.

I don't judge anyone for preferring C1. It's a personal choice. I just don't like to see the facts distorted. Say whatever you want about C2 gameplay but the graphics are actually pretty nice. I prefer the new aliens in C2. Much more agile. I think C1 was more impressive in terms of the scale of the 3d world and level of detail.

 

Greetings!

The ones I remember using were Triple C and Mster Config.

 

I am looking it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXgRu9fvPe4

Quite a cool C1 cutscene.

 

Greetings!

It is. But it does look better at more than 240p...

 

/me sighs

 

I think Crysis 2 has some nicer textures here and there but overall I think the first game looks better. And I think it's a better game too, but you don't even want to debate that.

You are the one who dragged me in to an argument btw. I just made my random comment about preferring the first game, and along you came to tear it down and even went so far as to criticise all of society. And then when challenged on it you say that you don't even care about the games and you don't care about gameplay.

So really, you entire argument is JUST that Crysis 2 is the better looking game, and then when someone posts a screenshot of both that suggests otherwise, you ignore it.

Kudos on the trolling, you managed to prolong this thread by about 5 extra pages so far, all for something you don't even care about. Good going.

 

It depends what you look for I guess. I tend to look at texture res and for the most part they are very detailed in C2. C1 they are showing their age up close but nevertheless the game is still very impressive. I like both games actually. The screenshots I took from C1 yesterday certainly show much lower texture detail on the trees. It's to be expected though since the game was released a long time ago.

I may go back and play Warhead from start to finish without using stealth mode if possible.

 

Greetings!

Feathers, see how much better Crysis 2 can get:
http://www.crymod.com/viewtopic.php?f=308&t=71027

That was what I expected from Crysis 2 graphics!

 

Just when I thought the game was already Jaw dropping they did this...

 

Greetings!

More about the tesselation trick nVidia likes:
http://techreport.com/articles.x/21404/1