1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

News Intel: "code for thousands of cores"

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 2 Jul 2008.

  1. CardJoe

    CardJoe Freelance Journalist

    Joined:
    3 Apr 2007
    Posts:
    11,343
    Likes Received:
    292
  2. liratheal

    liratheal Sharing is Caring

    Joined:
    20 Nov 2005
    Posts:
    9,798
    Likes Received:
    466
    I'll be more interested when developers can use more than one effectively :/

    Until then, more than two or four is completely redundant. Hell, four is probably OTT considering the lack of proper use all four get.
     
  3. Xir

    Xir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    86
    How is the game situation?

    Are dualcores (or even quad) utilized yet?

    And please don't answer "yeah, i've got the system running on one core, and the game on the other" I mean are games utilizing both (or all three/four) cores by now?
     
  4. Nuffenburger

    Nuffenburger The Burgerman Can

    Joined:
    18 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    yeh but imagine the capabilities.... rofl.
    i say bring them out... nobody will buy them but hey they will make the price of the quad extremes go down rofl.
    i got a dual core atm. but its not the best. i just cant wait til they bring out something decent that will overclock to more than 10ghz yet stay as cool as a fridge.
    introduce a new overclocking system or something.
    they should be atleast 5ghz stock by now.


    -burgerman
     
  5. iwod

    iwod New Member

    Joined:
    22 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Muti Core - ( Tens / Hundred of Cores ) sounds to me just like the MHz race.
    I think IPC and Mhz are still very important and should grow in both direction.

    Instead of simple just add HUGE amount of core.
     
  6. Kúsař

    Kúsař regular bit-tech reader

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    317
    Likes Received:
    4
    It sounds like "Let's learn how to thread CPU instructions!"
     
  7. Timmy_the_tortoise

    Timmy_the_tortoise International Man of Awesome

    Joined:
    28 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    1,039
    Likes Received:
    7
    I want my 100+ core Sandy Bridge NOW.... despite the fact that over 90% of it's processing power won't be utilised.
     
  8. stephen2002

    stephen2002 New Member

    Joined:
    23 Sep 2003
    Posts:
    183
    Likes Received:
    0
    If Intel pushes developers in this direction the GPU makers are going to be very happy. They already have processors with hundreds of cores. If the OS can run quickly on a CPU with hundreds of low-speed cores then why use the CPU at all?
     
  9. Timmy_the_tortoise

    Timmy_the_tortoise International Man of Awesome

    Joined:
    28 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    1,039
    Likes Received:
    7
    What about a CPU with hundreds of high speed cores? Not to mention it'll be x86, far more flexible.
     
  10. mrb_no1

    mrb_no1 Pie Eater

    Joined:
    15 Sep 2007
    Posts:
    394
    Likes Received:
    1
    For those who posted up top, i know that supreme commander utilizes 3 cores, not massively efficiently and it could do with using 4 cores imo as game time still slips down to 1 game second=1.5 real life seconds. Some people had mentioned crysis' with its extra physics being a burden, but i have no experience with crysis so i couldnt comment on that....i think the fact of the matter is that cpu development is running too far ahead of software developers, especially when games take years to make...

    peace

    fatman
     
  11. Timmy_the_tortoise

    Timmy_the_tortoise International Man of Awesome

    Joined:
    28 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    1,039
    Likes Received:
    7
    I thought Crysis' multi-core usage was supposed to be very disappointing.. It was supposed to use a whole 4 core CPU, but only ended up using 2 cores at any one time.
     
  12. MrMonroe

    MrMonroe New Member

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excuses, excuses...

    Plenty of applications could never be designed to be multi-threaded. There's lots of math that can only be done one step at a time, and passing the potato around from one core to the next with each step won't improve speed one bit. (though it might keep the thing cooler)
     
  13. badders

    badders Neuken in de Keuken

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    2,635
    Likes Received:
    72

    The Crysis Demo definitely did not use 4 cores effectively.

    However, Assassin's Creed PC and Race Driver:GRiD do use 4 cores well. Assassin's creed is particularly well balanced across 4 processors.
     
  14. leexgx

    leexgx CPC hang out zone (i Fix pcs i do )

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2006
    Posts:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    8
    very sure supreme commander is dual threaded as see CPU use when this game is running you add the 3 other cores up that tends to = 1 core, there are programs i think that you can run to make the supreme commander threads run on other cores
     
  15. LordPyrinc

    LordPyrinc Legomaniac

    Joined:
    7 Mar 2008
    Posts:
    595
    Likes Received:
    5
    Agree with all those that want better multi-core support. Apps still in development and in the future need to be able to scale better to a multi core environment, whether it be 2, 3, 4 ... x number of cores.
     
  16. E.E.L. Ambiense

    E.E.L. Ambiense Acrylic Heretic

    Joined:
    26 Jul 2007
    Posts:
    2,957
    Likes Received:
    68
    I guess a good analogy for this would be having more than two testicles: It'd be nice, but you only really need two. :D
     
  17. DXR_13KE

    DXR_13KE BananaModder

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2005
    Posts:
    9,090
    Likes Received:
    357
    our brain is massively parallel and slow frequency... i wonder what will be the capabilities of the new cpus in AI and other areas.....
     
  18. Yemerich

    Yemerich I can has PERSUADETRON?

    Joined:
    15 Sep 2004
    Posts:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    36
    Hmmm i didn't knew GOLLUM works for intel
     
  19. dr-strangelove

    dr-strangelove New Member

    Joined:
    26 Feb 2008
    Posts:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    'Intel core 600 4.0GHz processor, guaranteed not to attempt world domination or your money back'
     
  20. Xir

    Xir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    86
    ...is this still the old "core times out of sync" problem that the first AMD dual-cores had? I'd thought that issue had been rooted out since the 2nd gen x2 processors...

    Remember the "I've got a dual core and every time i start a game i go into taskmanager and manually assign a single core...no now we've got a tool that does this automatically..cooool"?
    Made me buy a quicker clocked single core at the time :D

    But as I said, this is ancient history, right?
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page