Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by CardJoe, 9 Sep 2011.
Every time I read an old review by Joe I get sad.
Crytek feeling hard up?
Oh my god watched the footage, no AA what so ever and it looks really poor people look odd and everything just looks flat.
Surely they just threw it into the new engine and scaled back the areas that were still too big? It would be cool to get new engine/DX11 treatment on the PC side, if a tad unnecessary.
Added effect: Shart smear.
To add that quintessential console goodness.
It's going to look terrible. If my 580 at 1ghz struggles to run it, my 360 will eat it up and spit it out while choking itself on a RROD.
Basically using cheap tricks to make the horrendously dumbed down visuals look slightly less pants
watching the trailer the lighting and TOD looks horrible.
How have you got to 1Ghz?
Seriously? a 580 struggles with it? what res? I can run it smoothly enough with the highest detail on 512MB 9800GTX+'s in SLI mode.
PS what is Shart Smear?
A PC game being ported to console, surely these days that is some sort of taboo in the dev industry...
I think he means that the old reviews went into a lot more detail.
So... instead of fixing issues in C2 they are making a good game worse... again. Right.
Anyone else notice that the armour mode has the effect around the edges so people know they are in it?
How I got it to 1ghz: watercooling. And yes, running it at 2560*1440 at full antialiasing screws it over. As for shart smearing, imagine running crysis maxed out on your gaming pc. Now rub the screen with a turd. Now you have console quality
Consoles eh, but can they run Crysis? Oh wait...
Prob a cryengine 3 remake. Does that mean dx11 for pc version?
Separate names with a comma.