1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Blogs Sandy Bridge overclocks to 5.2GHz?

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Lizard, 1 Oct 2010.

  1. Lizard

    Lizard @ Scan R&D

    Joined:
    17 Feb 2007
    Posts:
    2,890
    Likes Received:
    34
  2. Th3Maverick

    Th3Maverick New Member

    Joined:
    23 Aug 2006
    Posts:
    165
    Likes Received:
    0
    What? I can't tell if they're being intentionally cryptic or if it's just bad engrish.
     
  3. Bufo802

    Bufo802 New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jul 2008
    Posts:
    335
    Likes Received:
    8
    Probably still a NDA or something so not allowed to say anything definite....does sound impressive though.
     
  4. Skiddywinks

    Skiddywinks Member

    Joined:
    10 Aug 2008
    Posts:
    930
    Likes Received:
    8
    That would mean Intel are giving us a lot more multipliers than expected if this is a generic SB chip, or that the K chips really will be worth their money.

    I guess more details are needed before we know for sure, but I am assuming the latter since the former would make no sense (why limit overclocking the FSB just to give everyone more multipliers?).
     
  5. Jack_Pepsi

    Jack_Pepsi Clan BeeR Founder

    Joined:
    24 Apr 2006
    Posts:
    646
    Likes Received:
    11
    At least they all got their suffixes correct. Interestingly cryptic, hmmm.... interesting.

    ;)
     
  6. GravitySmacked

    GravitySmacked Mostly Harmless

    Joined:
    2 Mar 2009
    Posts:
    3,933
    Likes Received:
    73
    Let's hope so and let's hope if it is the K series that the premium isn't too exorbitant.
     
  7. Goty

    Goty New Member

    Joined:
    13 Dec 2005
    Posts:
    411
    Likes Received:
    4
    Well, knowing Intel and their habit of gouging the enthusiast with the EE series in the past....
     
  8. Fizzban

    Fizzban Man of Many Typos

    Joined:
    10 Mar 2010
    Posts:
    3,334
    Likes Received:
    118
    If that is serious.. that's pretty amazing.
     
  9. wuyanxu

    wuyanxu still wants Homeworld 3

    Joined:
    15 Aug 2007
    Posts:
    10,590
    Likes Received:
    231
    "sure you can get to 5GHz, but we'll only let you run at 3GHz unless you sell me an arm and a leg." -Intel
     
  10. Xtrafresh

    Xtrafresh It never hurts to help

    Joined:
    27 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    100
    will you pussies stop whining about a product that's not even here yet!

    /rant

    More ontopic, 5GHz zounds nice :)
     
  11. [USRF]Obiwan

    [USRF]Obiwan New Member

    Joined:
    9 Apr 2003
    Posts:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    5
    Who says its a intel cpu. could be a ARM

    ;)
     
  12. Adnoctum

    Adnoctum Kill_All_Humans

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    486
    Likes Received:
    31
    We can't infer shipping multipliers or clock speeds, or indeed anything at all about a product you can buy, from this because there's no info on the chip used. The chip could be an unlocked and selected Engineering Sample. Is it representative of retail?
    Regardless, it is looking good.
     
  13. Adnoctum

    Adnoctum Kill_All_Humans

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    486
    Likes Received:
    31
    I wish!
    I see the jk, but being serious he says it is 4 core/8 threads, and ARM doesn't thread.
    In fact, they take the AMD approach and say SMT is wasteful.
     
  14. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    The ho-har over SMT is part marketing part pipeline approach.

    SMT is DIFFICULT to qualify - so some companies just say it's not worth it to avoid bothering. IBM has had its own version for as long, if not longer than Intel too and Nvidia's Fermi cores are 'dual-issue' as well.

    Intel was supposedly meant to launch P4 with SMT but dropped it for 2 generations. Core launched without SMT and got it two generations later as well, but it arguably didn't really need it as it used a more efficient sub-20 pipeline though (iirc). Also, Intel has pumped a ton of research cash into branch prediction and data pre-fetching since P4 days (afaik, maybe before) which helps keep the pipeline full for SMT. AMD's branch prediction claims to be 'not as good' and didn't need to be with K8's brute force method of low-latency memory controller and dual channel DDR, but it's having to get better. I've no idea about ARM, but AMD is SMT-ing its transistor intensive FPU for Fuzion since it claims when it's locked to one core it's usage is only about 40%.

    Atom also benefits from SMT even despite its short pipeline because of its in-order architecture - ARM could have done the same with its CPUs which would certainly have benefited its more recent A8s, but I bet they are patented out of the market and/or don't have the engineers for it. AMD certainly didn't used to have either and I doubt that has changed with staffing cuts in recent years.

    /brain dump
     
  15. GoodBytes

    GoodBytes How many wifi's does it have?

    Joined:
    20 Jan 2007
    Posts:
    12,300
    Likes Received:
    709
    Doesn't mean that a processor goes to 9 billion MHz that is faster than a Pentium 2.
    Also, this is probably the highest end model CPU, with Unlock Premium card that will cost 300$ to unlock even more the CPU to access these speeds.
     
  16. thehippoz

    thehippoz New Member

    Joined:
    19 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    5,780
    Likes Received:
    174
    wow less than 7 second pi.. that's a engineering sample too- retail will probably be better
     
  17. Adnoctum

    Adnoctum Kill_All_Humans

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    486
    Likes Received:
    31
    I can't remember where I saw it, but I believe ARM's argument was over power usage and cache access problems. They said SMT uses 50% or so more power than if you had just added a second core. I'll see if I can find a link.

    On paper, I like AMD's module approach to the Bulldozer with the sharing of under-used resources and utilising die space and power to where it can make more use. Very exciting times

    Like you said, I think development resources stops AMD from doing it themselves. It is one of those last 5% architecture features that would soak up more development and research time and resources than it would be worth. Of course, it could be a engineering cultural thing, and AMD truly sees little benefit in it.

    Edit: It took some finding, but I found the Goodacre (ARM) article on multi-threading. It's a bit older than I thought, 2006, so perhaps things have changed.
    http://www.design-reuse.com/article...using-multiprocessors-and-multithreading.html
     
    Last edited: 1 Oct 2010
  18. Adnoctum

    Adnoctum Kill_All_Humans

    Joined:
    27 Apr 2008
    Posts:
    486
    Likes Received:
    31
    If Sandy Bridge isn't in a mature state and ready for release right now, then something has gone very wrong. Hi Cookie wouldn't be working with early development samples. The rest of the time until release should be for partner qualification work and tweaking, not chip/process development.

    I am starting to feel the upgrade itch though.
     
  19. Krayzie_B.o.n.e.

    Krayzie_B.o.n.e. New Member

    Joined:
    2 Aug 2009
    Posts:
    427
    Likes Received:
    6
    sure and for $1200.00 you can get this amazing chip that will smash super pi but run games 5 fps faster than a stock $300 AMD.

    but unless you run super pi 24/7 then be my guess.

    hmm interesting....
     
  20. thehippoz

    thehippoz New Member

    Joined:
    19 Dec 2008
    Posts:
    5,780
    Likes Received:
    174
    yeah that's true.. if it's the overpriced extreme- that would suck though if the chips have that much overhead sitting there locked.. is it confirmed they are doing away with ocing?
     
Tags: Add Tags

Share This Page