1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Snoopers Charter passed into Law

Discussion in 'Serious' started by Darkwisdom, 22 Nov 2016.

  1. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,142
    Likes Received:
    135
    I'm sure the gambling commission and revenue and customs are constantly dealing with terrorists.
     
  2. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,540
    Likes Received:
    785
    Likewise the Food Standards Agency and the Department of Transport.
     
  3. Guest-16

    Guest-16 Guest

    All the red top tabs have to do is employ a contractor/bribe a civil servant and they could mine a year's worth of data to destroy anyone. Phone hacking looks like child's play. Rupert Murdoch is gonna love it. None of this is without a warrant so even if you just look at something questionable, it'll be used against you. Insane. totally insane. I'm never returning. This has sealed it in my mind. Will actively research a new country to bring up my children.
     
  4. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    3,726
    Likes Received:
    183
    Why did the patient die?
    The ambulance driver was looking through the patients internet history to decide if he was worth saving:eyebrow:
     
  5. Nexxo

    Nexxo Bargaining chip

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    32,889
    Likes Received:
    1,104
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,391
    Likes Received:
    186
  7. Goatee

    Goatee Active Member

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2015
    Posts:
    833
    Likes Received:
    30
  8. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,391
    Likes Received:
    186
    This is just a guess as I'm not that clued up on firewalls but I'm not sure a firewall would help much, the law says companies must help the security services compromise their own services and devices when requested/needed, and that extends to placing back doors in firewalls, routers, encryption, and basically everything that's used on the internet.

    If they divulge the existence of a government sanctioned backdoor they could face jail time, although how Mr IT guy is going to be able to distinguish between the government and bad guys back doors is anyone's guess

    The only way around it, and even then you couldn't be 100% sure, would be to use a VPN located somewhere other than the UK or other five eye country.

    As some critics have said the snoopers charter will only catch the innocent and incompetent, and there's other ways to catch incompetent criminals.
     
  9. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,142
    Likes Received:
    135
    Your best bet is to build your own router and put your ISP one in bridge mode, reducing the back door to what they would basically have at the ISP anyway.
     
  10. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    3,726
    Likes Received:
    183
    Some shameless shilling for those who want to take steps to mitigate the impact:

    https://pfsense.org
     
  11. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,391
    Likes Received:
    186
    Like most petitions on the parliament website the repeal the new Surveillance laws petition is likely to have little effect, however it maybe worth signing it if you object to mass surveillance.
     
  12. Nexxo

    Nexxo Bargaining chip

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    32,889
    Likes Received:
    1,104
    Or you can just voice your objection here. The government will know. :p
     
  13. Anfield

    Anfield Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Posts:
    3,726
    Likes Received:
    183
  14. Tynecider

    Tynecider Since ZX81

    Joined:
    23 Jun 2009
    Posts:
    804
    Likes Received:
    28
  15. Nexxo

    Nexxo Bargaining chip

    Joined:
    23 Oct 2001
    Posts:
    32,889
    Likes Received:
    1,104
  16. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,142
    Likes Received:
    135
    Paywall, again
     
  17. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,391
    Likes Received:
    186
    I thought membership of the EU was unrelated to the ECJ (can't check the article (paywall)), or am i confusing the ECJ with whatever court presides over human rights?
     
  18. theshadow2001

    theshadow2001 [DELETE] means [DELETE]

    Joined:
    3 May 2012
    Posts:
    5,142
    Likes Received:
    135
    From the first line that appears on googling ecj:

     
  19. RedFlames

    RedFlames ...is not a Belgian football team

    Joined:
    23 Apr 2009
    Posts:
    9,540
    Likes Received:
    785
    The European Court of Justice [ECJ] is an EU institution...

    The European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR] is not.
     
  20. Corky42

    Corky42 What did walle eat for breakfast?

    Joined:
    30 Oct 2012
    Posts:
    8,391
    Likes Received:
    186
    My confusion there i think, without having read the article though I'm not sure why the ECJ would be involved with the snoopers charter, IIRC the ECJ just clarifies European law, while the ECtHR deals with convention, like the human rights bill we signed.

    Would be interested to know what European law the snoopers charter breaks. :confused:
     

Share This Page