1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Other Geekbench scores

Discussion in 'Hardware' started by Bloody_Pete, 14 Dec 2011.

  1. law99

    law99 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    63
    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/559922

    New memory. 1600mhz of it. Still 8gig.

    4.7ghz clock... just enough to clear all those Phenoms... PHEW!!!

    Also, feel for you Tundra as the memory performance definitely makes a difference in this particular bench.

    I'll try harder later.
     
    Teelzebub likes this.
  2. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    Enough to clear the Phenoms, but not the lone, overheating FX series before you. :D

    I still rage at the controller. Piledriver isn't likely to be much better, either. It'll still be using the same socket, so the NB bottleneck will still be there, even if they do improve the Memory Controller.
     
  3. law99

    law99 Custom User Title

    Joined:
    24 Sep 2009
    Posts:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    63
    Wa! shh... ;)

    To be fair to ... What? Same chipsets again? Easy upgrade path only goes so far. Eventually you want moar!!

    But to be fair to those phenoms... 6 cores, lower clocks, hampered by memory.
     
  4. longweight

    longweight Possibly Longbeard.

    Joined:
    7 May 2011
    Posts:
    10,517
    Likes Received:
    217
  5. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,859
    Likes Received:
    468
    Boards Updated.
     
    KidMod-Southpaw and Teelzebub like this.
  6. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,859
    Likes Received:
    468
    Works a treat. Using 0.015 +offset, and medium LLC and it gives me the exact same on load volts as my static settings. At idle, it's around 0.85V

    Idle:

    [​IMG]


    Being brutalised by IBT Max:

    [​IMG]


    Leaving it running to test stability, but as the Vcore is the same, and no other settings have been changed, I'm pretty certain it's fine.
     
  7. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    Exactly. I might be a bit peeved if AMD change sockets, but I'd accept it is needed in order to be able to open up for the next generation of processors that actually have a relatively good memory controller. They've been recycling the AM2/3/+ platform for, what, Eight years now?
     
  8. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    Excellent! I prefer it running low idle voltages, as opposed to running high voltages, even at idle speeds; = Longer life span for the chip.

    +Rep button for my awesomeness? Hint...hint :D
     
  9. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,859
    Likes Received:
    468
    Consider it done. :)
     
  10. fuus

    fuus Rocking All Year Christmas

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    515
    to correct mine, ram is 4.00 GB DDR3 SDRAM 533MHz
     
  11. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,859
    Likes Received:
    468
    Nope.. that's the RAM clock speed, but it's double pumped... hence DDR... DOUBLE data rate = 1066.
     
  12. flame696

    flame696 Terminating People Since 1980....

    Joined:
    15 May 2009
    Posts:
    5,585
    Likes Received:
    233
    hey pooky was is my laptop score not on the board???
     
  13. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,859
    Likes Received:
    468
    You're right... it's not. Will sort on next update, sorry.
     
    David likes this.
  14. fuus

    fuus Rocking All Year Christmas

    Joined:
    4 Dec 2010
    Posts:
    3,079
    Likes Received:
    515
    my bad! sorry Pook
     
  15. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    64bit-Chart is down, for me anyway. :)
     
    Teelzebub likes this.
  16. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    I can confirm it's dead, 404'd.
     
  17. Pookeyhead

    Pookeyhead It's big, and it's clever.

    Joined:
    30 Jan 2004
    Posts:
    10,859
    Likes Received:
    468
    Should all be working now. My host was having some issues yesterday. Updated also.
     
    JBond and Teelzebub like this.
  18. .//TuNdRa

    .//TuNdRa Resident Bulldozer Guru

    Joined:
    12 Feb 2011
    Posts:
    4,042
    Likes Received:
    109
    Schweet.
     
  19. Guest-44432

    Guest-44432 Guest

    Yep, all up and working again. :)
     
  20. j4mi3

    j4mi3 New Member

    Joined:
    28 Jun 2011
    Posts:
    1,033
    Likes Received:
    17
    this was at 5.2

    i still dont understand why my results are lower than some people's when they have lower clocks/the same clocks as me. if anyone could shed some insight it would be appreciated

    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/561297
     

Share This Page